» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

Snyder v. Phelps excerpt: Roberts's majority opinion in Westboro church case

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Wednesday, March 2, 2011; 11:31 AM

Following is an excerpt from Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.'s closing Wednesday in the court's ruling that the First Amendment protects even hurtful speech about public issues and upheld the right of Westboro Baptist Church to protest near military funerals.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

"Our holding today is narrow. We are required in First Amendment cases to carefully review the record, and the reach of our opinion here is limited by the particular facts before us. As we have noted, 'the sensitivity and significance of the interests presented in clashes between First Amendment and [state law] rights counsel relying on limited principles that sweep no more broadly than the appropriate context of the instant case.' Florida Star v. B. J. F., 491 U. S. 524, 533 (1989).

"Westboro believes that America is morally flawed; many Americans might feel the same about Westboro. Westboro's funeral picketing is certainly hurtful and its contribution to public discourse may be negligible. But Westboro addressed matters of public import on public property, in a peaceful manner, in full compliance with the guidance of local officials. The speech was indeed planned to coincide with Matthew Snyder's funeral, but did not itself disrupt that funeral, and Westboro's choice to conduct its picketing at that time and place did not alter the nature of its speech.

"Speech is powerful. It can stir people to action, move them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and - as it did here - inflict great pain. On the facts before us, we cannot react to that pain by punishing the speaker. As a Nation we have chosen a different course - to protect even hurtful speech on public issues to ensure that we do not stifle public debate. That choice requires that we shield Westboro from tort liability for its picketing in this case."


» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2011 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile