By Zachary A. Goldfarb and Dina ElBoghdady
Washington Post Staff Writers
Friday, March 4, 2011; 6:51 AM
Senior Obama administration officials, newly joined by state attorneys general, were on the brink Thursday of finalizing major elements of a possible settlement with large U.S. banks accused of flawed and fraudulent foreclosure practices, sources familiar with the discussions said.
But absent from this otherwise united government front, which is preparing to submit a proposed settlement to financial firms within days, is the regulator of the nation's largest banks, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.
The OCC has raised concerns that the firms might be required to pay too large a fine - $20 billion or more - and adopt mortgage procedures that the agency doesn't think make financial sense.
The sources spoke on the condition of anonymity because the terms of the discussions weren't finalized.
This split within the federal government echoes previous disagreements among regulators over how to respond to the financial crisis. The OCC and other bank regulators have been accused of coddling the firms they are supposed to be overseeing while agencies that have advocated a get-tough approach have been criticized for trying to gum up the financial machinery that makes the U.S. economy hum.
The nation's foreclosure crisis remains one of the drags on the U.S. economic recovery, and Obama administration officials are under pressure to help homeowners facing foreclosure.
Even as officials neared consensus over the changes they would require banks to make in foreclosure practices, there was still no decision about how large a penalty banks should face and whether they should pay a fine or devote the sum to helping rework mortgages for distressed borrowers. Officials have told banks they would like the industry to help avert 1.5 million new foreclosures, sources said.
On Thursday, senior officials from the Department of the Treasury and the Department of Housing and Urban Development discussed finalization of these terms. These discussions occurred as the Justice Department,, which has been coordinating the efforts, prepared to approach banks with a potential settlement.
One person close to the discussions said that a final round of face-to-face negotiations with banks would be held in the coming days, probably in Washington.
If the settlements are finalized, they could resolve a range of allegations that go beyond the flawed foreclosure practices, which came to light in the fall. The alleged infractions include that the banks failed to comply with federal rules requiring mortgage modifications, broke state laws when foreclosing on borrowers and lied to federal housing programs.
Last fall, the nation's largest banks were forced to freeze tens of thousands of foreclosures after widespread reports of problems with documents. After months of investigation by federal and state officials, the Justice Department has been holding discussions with representatives of banks in Washington about a potential settlement, sources said.
In recent days, federal officials have coalesced around proposed changes in bank practices aimed at safeguarding the mortgage modification and foreclosures processes, sources said.
Some of the proposed requirements would include increased staffing to ensure proper oversight of mortgage modifications and foreclosures and the designation of someone responsible for monitoring the paperwork. Another key change would curb the dual-track process followed by banks to initiate a foreclosure proceeding while they are modifying a mortgage.
Federal officials say they want a global settlement that resolves as many allegations as possible because they fear that prolonging litigation and investigations could damage the housing market further.
The alliance of federal and state officials is considering a penalty of at least $20 billion. Banks would find the $20 billion figure acceptable, if it is distributed over several institutions and resolves most of the outstanding foreclosure-related issues, sources said.
But Elizabeth Warren, who's in charge of setting up a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and Sheila Bair, chairwoman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., are pushing for an even higher figure, sources said. The two officials are playing influential roles in the government discussions.
The OCC remains outside the mainstream of discussions, pursuing its own track in crafting a possible settlement with the banks it oversees. An OCC spokesman said the agency is not standing in the way of a government-wide settlement but declined to comment further.
The OCC, which is independent of the administration, has sent draft orders to its banks requiring changes in how they modify mortgages in default. Some of these proposals are similar to the administration's.
The draft orders also seek to minimize the financial risks for banks arising from mortgage modification and foreclosure process.
The agency is also considering imposing a financial penalty and is weighing how harshly banks should be punished for foreclosure infractions.
The Federal Reserve, another banking regulator, is conducting its own review but is likely to join the government-wide settlement, sources said.
Many of the nation's attorneys general are planning to gather in Washington next week for a conference on a range of topics. Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, who is leading the 50-state investigation into the foreclosure abuses, is scheduled to update the group on where things stand, both with the banks and their federal counterparts.
Staff writers Brady Dennis and Jerry Markon contributed to this report.