washingtonpost.com
SEC head says she relied on counsel tied to Madoff account to sort out any conflict

By David S. Hilzenrath
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, March 9, 2011; 10:39 PM

SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro has told lawmakers that she left any ethical questions in former general counsel David M. Becker's hands when he told her in 2009 that his late mother had an account with Ponzi scheme operator Bernard Madoff.

"I do not recall asking Mr. Becker for or receiving additional information," Schapiro wrote in her first public statements on the matter since congressional Republicans called on her last month to explain how she dealt with Becker's potential conflicts of interest.

In a pair of letters Tuesday to six Republican members of Congress, Schapiro said she relied on Becker and an agency ethics officer to sort out any potential conflicts involving Becker's inheritance of the Madoff account.

Republican lawmakers have criticized the Securities and Exchange Commission for allowing Becker to help frame the agency's position on issues affecting investors in Madoff's Ponzi scheme even though he had a potential personal stake in those matters. They have said the SEC must live by the same ethical standards it demands of others.

Rep. Randy Neugebauer (R-Tex.), chairman of the House Financial Services subcommittee on oversight and investigations, said Wednesday that Schapiro appears to have handled the matter inappropriately and that the SEC seems to have "a very loose process" for addressing such issues.

"If someone comes to you and says, 'I may have a potential conflict of interest,' you don't say, 'Well, just use your best judgment,' " Neugebauer said.

Schapiro is likely to face questions about her actions when she testifies Thursday on Capitol Hill about the SEC's budget and operations. The issue has put her on the spot as she fights to defend the agency's funding from potential budget cuts.

Schapiro wrote Tuesday that she has asked the SEC's new ethics counsel to review the agency's procedures for evaluating conflicts of interest.

"When Mr. Becker initially notified me that his deceased mother had had a Madoff account that had been closed years earlier, the issue did not appear to me to present a conflict of interest," Schapiro said in one of the letters.

Schapiro was responding to questions from Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform; Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa); House Financial Services Chairman Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.); and three other Republican members of the Financial Services Committee: Jeb Hensarling of Texas, Scott Garrett of New Jersey and Neugebauer.

When Becker's mother died in 2004, she left a $2 million Madoff account. Becker and his brothers later liquidated the account, and Madoff's business was subsequently exposed as a fraud in which some investors were paid with other investors' money.

Schapiro said Becker told her about the matter shortly after he became general counsel of the SEC in 2009.

Becker became one of Schapiro's top advisers at the SEC shortly after Madoff's scheme collapsed. The agency faced criticism for not stopping the Ponzi scheme earlier, despite repeated warnings.

Schapiro said she did not ask Becker to recuse himself from work involving Madoff and that when he told her about his mother's account, she does not recall directing him "to take any other action with regard to the closed Madoff account." Becker sent SEC ethics counsel William Lenox an e-mail in May 2009 asking whether he should participate in SEC work involving the Madoff bankruptcy. Lenox responded about 25 minutes later, giving Becker a green light.

Recently, Becker was sued by a trustee involved in the Madoff bankruptcy who demanded that Becker and his family return $1.5 million of payouts they received from the Ponzi scheme.

The SEC has taken at least two positions that had the potential to affect people such as Becker who benefited from the Ponzi scheme. First, it argued that they should not be entitled to the fictitious balances shown on their Madoff account statements - an argument that potentially ran contrary to Becker's financial interests. Second, it argued that investors should be entitled to an inflation adjustment on the money they deposited with Madoff, not just the amount of money they put into their Madoff accounts minus the amount they withdrew. That position had the potential to benefit people in Becker's situation.

The Republican staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform has concluded that SEC officials agreed to endorse the first of those positions before Becker became involved but that he and his office recommended the second of those positions, a member of the committee staff said on the condition of anonymity because the staff member was not authorized to speak publicly.

But former SEC enforcement official Stephen J. Crimmins said any gain Becker would reap as a result of the inflation adjustment would be "minuscule" compared with his personal wealth and the $6 million of income that Crimmins estimated Becker, a former law firm partner, gave up to work at the SEC for two years.

Becker was invited to testify before two subcommittees of Issa's panel Thursday but declined because his family had previously scheduled a trip, said William R. Baker III, an attorney for Becker.

On Friday, SEC inspector general H. David Kotz said he had opened a probe into the matter.

Becker left the SEC last month. Schapiro wrote that he had completed the two-year commitment he made when he rejoined the agency in 2009. Becker first worked at the SEC from 1998 to 2002 as deputy general counsel and then general counsel.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company