washingtonpost.com
Defining a soldier as 'lowly'

Friday, March 18, 2011; 6:48 PM

"A lowly corporal"? I started to read Paul Duggan's article on the burial of Frank Woodruff Buckles, the last U.S. veteran of World War I to die, and I was turned off by those first three words in the article. Rank is rank, and to refer to Frank Buckles as a "lowly corporal" was a direct insult to a soldier who risked his life so Duggan could write his article.

I am writing as the wife of a retired U.S. Marine who served in Korea and Vietnam. I won't tell you his rank.

Mary D. Battista, Triangle

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company