washingtonpost.com
The case for combat pay for everybody

Sunday, March 20, 2011; 8:29 PM

It's a nice idea that Michael G. Cummings has ["I didn't deserve my combat pay," Washington Forum, March 18], but he forgot one thing: We are all riflemen. That things may be considered good for some time does not mean they always will. Every soldier and Marine must be prepared to fight at a moment's notice, including those deployed to Victory Base Complex in Iraq and other compounds that never receive enemy contact. If Victory had been attacked, Mr. Cummings would have had to fight just like any other soldier. That is the purpose of combat pay: One is in a position where he or she might at any time meet with and destroy the enemy.

Terron Sims II, Arlington

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company