5 Questions: White Sox Flirting With History

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Les Carpenter
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, September 23, 2005; 1:36 PM

1. If the White Sox don't win the AL Central, will it be the worst collapse ever?

There isn't a precedent for what the White Sox are doing. On Aug. 1, they had a 15-game lead with 58 to play. No one has ever fallen that far and missed the postseason. So yes, the White Sox could have the worst fall. And for the first time they seem to accept that this is possible. Manager Ozzie Guillen has said that if his team wins 95 or 96 games and fails to make the playoffs he could live with that outcome. His players are starting to say the same thing. That, of course, assumes the White Sox split their last 10 games, which seems unlikely the way they are playing now.

In any case, with a lead down to 1½ games with 10 to play, the fall might not be as bad as the 1964 Phillies, who blew a 6½-game lead with 15 to play and finished in third behind St. Louis and Cincinnati. The 1951 Dodgers lost a 4½ game lead over the Giants with 10 games left and wound up losing in a playoff on Bobby Thomson's home run.

At least the White Sox, whose decline has been more steady, won't have collapsed that badly.

2. Do the Padres have a chance in the postseason?

As far as underdogs go, San Diego might be the biggest. It's not even the record -- which could well be sub-.500. After all, the Padres have not used some of their better players at times in hopes of resting everybody for the playoffs. This probably cost them some games but they knew there was no way they were going into October as anything other the third-best division winner.

The bigger problem is their starting pitching. They have little of it. Any team that is looking at starting Pedro Astacio and Chan Ho Park in the postseason has pitching problems. Therefore their best hopes come down to Jake Peavy. The only problem with Peavy is that he is recovering from a shoulder problem and has lost several miles per hour off his fastball. That said, he won the other night in his return to the mound, leaving just a glimmer of hope for the Padres that he could start twice in a short series.

And who knows?

3. Does Barry Bonds make the Giants favorites in the NL West next year?

Had he returned sooner, San Francisco might be leading the division, given how bad it was this season. But Bonds' four home runs in a little more than a week serves notice that he is indeed back to his old form. And with that swing comes the fear. When the Nationals walked him to get to Moises Alou the other night, it was just like the old days. And Alou became an immediate beneficiary as Livan Hernandez grooved a fastball that Bonds hammered over the fence.

Start spreading Bonds' intentional walks over a year and the hitters before and after him will become empowered.

"Since Barry came back, it's really made this team a lot better," Alou told the San Francisco Chronicle. "It's a whole different game. Hopefully we can keep playing the way we are playing and I think we will."


CONTINUED     1        >


More in the Baseball Section

Baseball Insider

Baseball Insider

In-depth news, analysis and insight on Major League Baseball.

Nationals Journal

Nationals Journal

Chico Harlan keeps you up-to-date with every swing the Nationals make.

Stadium Guide

Stadium Guide

Take an interactive tour of the district's newest stadium, Nationals Park.

© 2005 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive