| Page 2 of 5 < > |
Bikini Journalism
|
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
|
Each of these news organizations is in the business of calling people for interviews every day. The implicit, and sometimes explicit, appeal: If you talk to us, we will treat you fairly. Your side will be represented. It is better to cooperate with a story than to slam the door and hide behind nonresponsive statements.
Except, apparently, when the journalists themselves are involved.
Double Duty
Dina Temple-Raston, who covers the FBI for National Public Radio, did a story last week on objections by civil libertarians to the bureau's tactics in conducting surveillance without court orders. The first person she quoted was an official at the American Civil Liberties Union.
Temple-Raston is also the co-author of a new book titled "In Defense of Our America." The other author is Anthony Romero, executive director of the ACLU. The book "illustrates the dangerous erosion of the Bill of Rights in the age of terror," as the organization's Web site puts it.
Does being partners with such a prominent civil libertarian raise questions about an FBI beat reporter?
"When you see my name on the book, it's absolutely fair to wonder what the depth of participation was," Temple-Raston says. When she was hired by NPR six months ago while finishing the book, "we talked about whether there could be a conflict of interest."
Temple-Raston says that she signed on to the project after Romero got the contract and that they had mainly an "e-mail relationship." She says NPR editors came up with "common sense" guidelines that do not allow her to quote Romero or profile the ACLU, but that still allow her to use the organization as a source.
"I'm attuned to the problem that there could be a perception issue," she says. "The ACLU and other civil liberties groups are going to be part of my beat. It's something I think about, it's something I'm aware of, just like I worry about being too sympathetic to the FBI. I'm trying to be really, really balanced."
Losing Face
Amy Polumbo's Facebook photos were embarrassing enough. Miss New Jersey unveiled them on the "Today" show Thursday after someone sent them to pageant officials in an effort to discredit her. While fully clothed, Polumbo was seen with male friends nuzzling and groping her breasts, and in other less-than-ladylike poses.
But editors at the New York Daily News should be equally red-faced. The tabloid touted what it said were the secret Facebook shots -- only to have Polumbo say on "Today" that morning that those pictures weren't of her, just some of her partying friends. The News expressed regret in a correction Friday, saying the paper had been assured about the photos by "a source close to Miss Polumbo." Not that close, apparently.
Aftermath
The recent MSNBC.com report on political contributions by 143 journalists has had repercussions at the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
According to a local publication, Style Weekly, the Virginia paper has suspended statehouse reporter Michael Hardy and copy editor Pam Mastropaolo for 30 days for donating to Democrats. The paper acknowledged only that disciplinary action has been taken.


