washingtonpost.com
Opinion Focus with Eugene Robinson

Eugene Robinson
Tuesday, March 8, 2011; 1:00 PM

Eugene Robinson discusses his recent columns and the latest news.

_______________________

Eugene Robinson: Hello, everyone. Welcome to our weekly discussion. Let's get started.

_______________________

Muslims: Could you please cite some examples in one of your columns where Muslims have condemmed sharia law? Also, where Muslims have spoken out against the need to kill the non-believers or those who have left the religion? I expect you to be silient on those issues.

Eugene Robinson: This question is irrelevant. Should we demand that people denounce Godzilla? Come out against killer asteroids? Come on.

_______________________

Investigate REAL Domestic Terrorism: Gene, Interesting column. I wonder if King is interested in investigating other brands of homegrown terrorism -- like that committed by "Christians" who blow up abortion clinics and shoot physicians who provide women's health services. No, probably not.

Eugene Robinson: has cultivated relationships with Muslims in his district. Now, however, he has (in my opinion) gone over the edge.

_______________________

Rep. King's hearings: After seeing you on MSNBC this morning it is very clear to me that you are absolutely correct in your position. Unfortunately, Rep King did not recognize that he agreed with you when he repeatedly mentioned that AG Holder "could not sleep because of the level of domestic terrorism.". To your point, the issue is domestic terrorism, not just Islamic terrorism. If his hearings bore this title and this focus, maybe we could kill two (or more) birds with one.

Eugene Robinson: Exactly right. I remember when the Oklahoma City bombing happened and the first speculation was that it had to be related to Islamic terrorism. Turned out to be Timothy McVeigh. If Rep. King thinks he knows with certainty where the next terrorist attack will come from, he's wrong.

_______________________

Radical Islamist discussion: Do you not see a conflict between a segment of our population which holds to the opinion that destroying human life is a necessary end to a means regarding "cleansing" and honor to Allah and bigotry, as opposed to honest and earnest discussion regarding a violent segment of a particular religion? How does one combat this menace without words? Love denotes responsibility from both the lover and the recipient. Radical Islam is not a mere religion, it is a religion which encompasses both the peaceful and the murderer in it's ranks, without open censure of the last mentioned.

Eugene Robinson: The Ku Klux Klan claimed to be acting in the name of Christianity. The Irgun committed bombings in the name of Judaism. Should we, then, decide that there's something inherently violent and unacceptable about Christianity and Judaism?

_______________________

Bias Against Islam: Eugene, what do you think it would take to eliminate the bias against Islam from the overwhelming majority of the American public? If this sort of thing was being proposed against Mormons or Jews, there would be a huge outcry, but because of 9/11 I believe the public has a high tolerance for this sort of behavior and even encourage it against Muslims.

Eugene Robinson: Good question, and I don't have a good answer. There are more than a billion Muslims in the world, yet some people are ready to paint them all with the same brush.

_______________________

Non-believers: Could this first poster site some examples where Christians have spoken out against the biblical requirement to smite non-believers?

Eugene Robinson: You're right, there's a whole lot of smiting in the Bible. I guess we should be suspicious of any Christians and Jews who don't denounce those violent roots of their religions.

_______________________

Mr King and terrorism: Hi Gene. Don't you find it ironic that Mr. King thought the IRA was an acceptable organization but seems to see Islamic terrorist lurking in America's mosques? I guess Catholics can't be terrorists!

Eugene Robinson: In the column, I didn't have space to get into Rep. King's history with the IRA. He actually played a constructive role in helping to reach a settlement of the Troubles. But he was palsy-walsy with leaders of Sinn Fein, the IRA's political arm, at a time when the IRA was still committing acts of terrorism. Perhaps Congress should have launched a full investigation of the Irish-American community, which supplied the IRA with a lot of money and arms.

_______________________

Radical Muslims in the United States: Is it irrational to fear the irrational and deadly acts of radical Muslims? Do you deny that there are radical Muslims in the United States who wish to do harm to the United States and its citizens? Just look at the record. Some day you will write something that I agree with. It's not happened so far. But I have hope. Jesse Jackson did once and so did Pat Buchanan.Donald W. Bales

Eugene Robinson: Hope springs eternal. I do not doubt that somewhere in this vast nation there are would-be terrorists who believe in a warped version of Islam. No one is more horrified by this prospect -- or more effective in bringing such miscreants to the attention of the authorities -- than the large, diverse community of American Muslims. What I object to, and you should also condemn, is Rep. King's attempt to indict that whole community. Is any Muslim, in his view, a suspect? If so, this is the kind of thinking that led to the internment of Japanese-American citizens during World War II.

_______________________

Speaking out against whatnow?: To the first poster: why should anyone have to denounce the actions of crazy people? Maybe I should ask white people to denounce the Klan. Every white person I meet now needs to denounce the Klan to my face or I'll assume they're secretly racist. That wouldn't make any dang sense, but it's the same basic logic, isn't it?

Eugene Robinson: Yes, it's the same logic. Or illogic.

_______________________

The world and country are changing, and some people aren't happy.: I think a lot of (especially older) Americans are freaking out because the world and the US are changing in ways they don't like and that scare them. Not everybody is a Christian anymore. Not everybody abroad likes the US. There are gays now. And to top it off, the President doesn't look like presidents are supposed to, and is young, urban, well-educated, and international. In summary, I think there is a lot of fear of being somehow left behind.Do you think this is a reasonable analysis?

Eugene Robinson: Yes, I do believe the fact that the face of the nation is literally changing unnerves some people.

_______________________

Mr. Kings hearings: Mr. Robinson, this is a Christian based country, much like Saudi Arabia or others are Muslim-based countries. Do they welcome Christians into their countries with open arms? I think Americans think like Teddy Rossevelt who insisted that you be Americans first then whatever else you are-Muslim or otherwise. How the hearings are handled- properly or improperly- should be the main concern. Your thoughts?

Eugene Robinson: The Constitution makes clear that there is no official or established religion in the United States. So this is not a "Christian based country." Americans who are Muslim are Americans first, just as Christians who are Americans are Christians first.

_______________________

I do believe the fact that the face of the nation is literally changing unnerves some people.: That is true, but please note that there are many "white americans" that are not scared about this and instead embrace it. Young and old. I think sometimes the ignorant invididuals get the ink and the people who accept others equally are ignored.

Eugene Robinson: That's very true. Thanks for reminding us.

_______________________

The here and now: How about we concentrate on the here and now and the fact that radical Muslims, hiding within and concealed by the moderate Muslim community, are a danger to us? The violent roots of Christianity and the Old Testament, as well as the Irgun and the IRA are anachronistic and irrelevant. The fact of the matter is that non-radical Muslims have not stepped up to the plate to denounce and deny the radicals in their midst.

Eugene Robinson: That is a lie. It is simply not true. Muslims have been as vocal in denouncing terrorism as non-Muslims. My colleague Richard Cohen has an excellent column today citing specifics of how Muslim Americans have aided authorities in thwarting terrorism. Perhaps you forget -- perhaps you didn't know -- that hundreds of Muslims were killed in the 9/11 atttacks, along with Christians, Jews, atheists... This slanderous allegation that the Muslim-American community somehow harbors terrorists is appalling.

_______________________

Speaking out: I think that this is an issue that won't go away anytime soon. Folks like Rep. King ask for investigations, and part of the stated reasons for it is that there isn't a nationally known Muslim leader here in the U.S. who can 'speak' to these issues. When the IRA set off bombs, there were church leaders (of various denominations) and Irish politicians who denounced the attacks. Opponents couldn't then say that all the Irish, or all Catholics, supported the attack. In part because of the non-hierarchical nature of Islam, there isn't a recognized individual who can come out and say 'Of course all Muslims don't agree with that' and end the debate early on. Until someone like that appears (and whether that person is a religious leader, or a Muslim who holds public office or other public position), the arguments of 'name one Muslim who has denounced this!" will continue.

Eugene Robinson: And that's all I have to say for today, folks. Thanks for participating, and see you again next week.

Post a Comment


Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.

© 2011 The Washington Post Company