The Filibuster Fight

Frustrated by the Democrats' efforts to block floor votes on President Bush's most controversial judicial nominees, the Senate Republican leadership is threatening to change the Senate's rules to prevent the filibustering of judicial nominations. The change to Senate rules would end the practice of requiring 60 votes to end the debate of a nomination.

The U.S. Capitol Building
AP
Analysis
The fragile compromise that averted a Senate showdown over judicial filibusters deliberately left unanswered the crucial issue likely to be at the heart of a debate over a future Supreme Court vacancy: Can Democrats filibuster a nominee on the grounds that he or she is too conservative without triggering the "nuclear option"?
 
DIGEST: Nation Digest (Post, November 5, 2009)
 
Post Politics Hour: Weekend review and a look ahead (washingtonpost.com, October 19, 2009; 11:00 AM)
 
Obama Criticized as Too Cautious, Slow on Judicial Posts (Post, October 16, 2009)
 

Washington Post Editorials 

Two Wrongs . . .
(Post, July 14, 2009)

Confirm Dawn Johnsen
(Post, April 30, 2009)

Aisle Crosser
(Post, April 29, 2009)

Budget Gimmicks (Cont'd)
(Post, April 5, 2009)

Bang for the Bucks
(Post, February 10, 2009)
More Stories
Commentary on the Filibuster Fight

Who Should Replace Ted Kennedy?
(Post, September 6, 2009)

Obama's Health-Care Realism
(Post, September 1, 2009)

Filibuster Nation
(Post, August 5, 2009)

The Limits of 60 Votes
(Post, July 5, 2009)

A Choice for the GOP
(Post, May 28, 2009)
More Stories
© 2005 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive