» This Story:Read +| Comments

Juleps for the Derby? All Bets Are Off.

(By Julia Ewan -- The Washington Post)
  Enlarge Photo     Buy Photo
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Jason Wilson
Wednesday, April 30, 2008; Page F05

My mother hails from the South, and every spring, something deep in my DNA seems to stir.

This Story

Or at least that's what I told myself the other afternoon when it was perfectly sunny out and I was sitting inside the Round Robin Bar at the Willard Hotel, drinking mint juleps. My mother's son is as Yankee as can be, so don't worry: This isn't going to turn into one of those sappy paeans to the Old South set to a refrain of "My Old Kentucky Home." You'll surely see enough of that as Derby Day approaches Saturday, along with fancy hats and people drinking bad mint juleps.

"The Kentucky Derby has done more to give this drink a bad name than anyone else," said Jim Hewes, the Round Robin Bar's veteran bartender, who deplores the mass-produced, lukewarm stuff -- full of shortcuts -- that often passes for a julep at this time of year. Hewes crafts beautiful mint juleps based on what reputedly was Henry Clay's original 19th-century recipe, and he probably makes more mint juleps each year than anyone else outside of Churchill Downs.

I happen to love mint juleps, but that afternoon a question arose in the Round Robin Bar, amid the billiard-table-green walls, dark wood and portraits of Buffalo Bill Cody, Eleanor Roosevelt and Walt Whitman. That question: Can the mint julep be saved from the Kentucky Derby?

If those are fightin' words, then fine. That's the thing about the mint julep. The drink, so seemingly straightforward, just causes arguments. I know right now, for instance, that I will get several dozen e-mails this week, politely (or maybe not so politely) correcting the mint julep recipe published here.

"It is a controversial drink, each maker insisting on a particular method with seldom any agreement," writes Collette Richardson in her 1973 House & Garden's Drink Guide.

"In the dark backward of time," writes cocktail historian Dave Wondrich, "the Proper Construction of the Julep, like the Beauty of My State's Women, and the Timing of Pickett's Charge, was one of those topics that an American male with social aspirations was expected to regard as a matter of honor."

Even Clay, the Great Compromiser, couldn't bear it when he arrived in the nation's capital and found juleps were being made with applejack and rum, not his native Kentucky bourbon. And so he demonstrated the proper way at the Willard Hotel.

What I like best about the mint julep is its simplicity: mint, sugar, bourbon, ice. Yet as with the martini and the Manhattan, there are hundreds of competing variations, and most of them boil down to esoteric matters of procedure. Do you add the ice before the bourbon, or the bourbon before the ice? What sort of mint do you use? Do you use branch water directly from the stream the bourbon distillery is built upon, or will a squirt of soda water from a gun work just fine?

Do you muddle the mint with refined sugar, simple syrup, perhaps peach syrup? Do you sprinkle confectioners' sugar on top, or add a little splash of rum? Do you use those precious silver beakers, or just a regular old Collins glass? Those issues can be debated until the end of time.

For me, the most important aspect of the mint julep is that it must be cold.

A mint julep should be so cold that the glass frosts. Don't even touch the glass with those warm, grubby hands of yours; use a napkin or a towel.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company