» This Story:Read +| Comments

Lawsuit Claims Gun Rules Violate Supreme Court Ruling

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, July 28, 2008; 12:37 PM

The man who successfully challenged the D.C. handgun ban before the Supreme Court filed a new federal lawsuit this morning, alleging that the District's new gun regulations are unlawful and burdensome.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

Dick A. Heller and two other plaintiffs alleged in the lawsuit that the D.C. government violated the letter and the spirit of the recent Supreme Court decision that struck down the District's decades-old handgun ban.

Saying that the new regulations illegally prohibit ownership of semi-automatic pistols and require an arbitrary fee, the lawsuit also claimed that the law established requirements that would make it impossible for people to defend themselves in their homes.

The new regulations require handgun owners to keep the weapons unloaded and either disassembled or secured by a trigger lock at home -- rules that flout the recent Supreme Court decision, said Heller's attorney, Stephen P. Halbrook.

"Under the D.C. [law], a robber has to make an appointment with you so you can get your gun ready for him," Halbrook said in an interview.

No court date has been set. Heller registered a revolver with the District on July 18. He wanted to register a semi-automatic Colt, but he was denied a license because D.C. police said they considered the weapon to be a machine gun, the suit alleged.

Under the D.C. law, semi-automatic pistols capable of shooting more than 12 shots without reloading are considered machine guns. The suit said such a definition "is contrary to the ordinary usage of those terms in the English language and in the laws of the United States."

D.C. officials were not immediately available for comment.

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the D.C. Section

Fixing D.C. Schools

Fixing D.C. Schools

The Washington Post investigates the state of the schools and the lessons of failed and successful reforms.



Use Neighborhoods to learn about Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia communities.

Top High Schools

Top High Schools

Jay Mathews identifies the nation's most challenging high schools and explains why they're best.

Facebook Twitter RSS
© 2008 The Washington Post Company