» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments

Latest From the D.C. Wire

Washington Post staff writers offer news and notes on District politics

Gun Bill Dangerous, D.C. Chief Tells House

"Imagine how difficult it will be for law enforcement to safeguard the public" if semiautomatic guns are allowed, D.C. Chief Cathy L. Lanier said. (By Katherine Frey -- The Washington Post)
  Enlarge Photo     Buy Photo
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 10, 2008; Page B01

D.C. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier assailed a new bill yesterday that would eliminate most of the District's gun laws, telling a congressional panel that the measure would allow residents to carry loaded semiautomatic rifles in the streets, creating a nightmare scenario for homeland security officials.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story
This Story

"Imagine how difficult it will be for law enforcement to safeguard the public, not to mention the new president at the inaugural parade, if carrying semiautomatic rifles were to suddenly become legal in Washington," she said.

Lanier sparred repeatedly with legislators who said the measure was necessary to allow D.C. residents to protect themselves from criminals. Rep. Dan Burton (R-Ind.) expressed support for the idea of legislators' being able to carry arms for protection on their way home from the Capitol at night.

But whether the bill would allow residents to sling semiautomatics over their shoulders in downtown Washington is in debate. Although the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform issued a legal analysis saying it would, the National Rifle Association disagreed.

"They're trying to twist this language to create some concern that is not legitimate," said Chris W. Cox, the NRA's chief lobbyist. He has described the gun measure as the group's "No. 1 legislative priority" in the congressional session that is drawing to a close.

The bill, introduced by Rep. Travis W. Childers (D-Miss.), was written after the Supreme Court struck down the city's 32-year-old handgun ban in June.

It would abolish the city's gun registration requirements and allow residents to own semiautomatic pistols and rifles. It also would permit them to buy guns in Virginia and Maryland and would scrap a regulation that firearms in homes be kept unloaded and safeguarded except in cases of imminent danger.

Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) is making a last-ditch attempt to head off the bill, offering legislation that would allow the District to rewrite its regulations to conform with the Supreme Court ruling.

The Norton bill is expected to come up for a vote today in the government reform committee. But even if it passes, congressional staffers and lobbyists on both sides of the issue expect the more sweeping legislation opposed by the D.C. government to prevail in the House.

It is not clear whether there is enough time for the Senate to act on the gun bill before Congress adjourns this month

Rep. Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.), head of the government reform committee, invited the leaders of major law enforcement agencies in Washington to testify on the broader gun bill yesterday. The U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Marshals Service did not appear, and Waxman criticized the Bush administration, saying it had "blocked their appearance."

A Secret Service spokesman, Malcolm Wiley, declined to comment when asked why no one from the agency appeared.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2008 The Washington Post Company