» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

Automakers' Fate Is on the Table

GM and Its Unions Are Negotiating Pay Cuts to Meet Terms of Federal Loan

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, January 15, 2009; Page D01

On one side of the table, representing General Motors, is Diana Tremblay, 49, the daughter of a GM engineer who grew up in an Ohio company town and then rose through the ranks to the corporate suite.

This Story

On the other, representing the United Auto Workers, is Cal Rapson, 63, a union member since 1965 when he joined the local at the Chevrolet engine plant in Flint, Mich. Each of his four grown daughters are members of the auto union. His personal motto is "never give up."

Together, meeting regularly at an office building in Detroit, the duo and their negotiating teams are trying to strike a deal that could determine the fate of the vast U.S. auto industry.

Their work is taking place behind closed doors; they declined to comment for this story. Under restrictions laid out by the Bush administration to receive a federal loan, they must cut worker pay and benefits to levels that are competitive with the plants that Honda, Toyota and Nissan operate in the United States.

By some estimates, that could mean dropping compensation by as much as 20 percent. Such a plunge would surely anger some workers, but if the negotiations fail in the coming months, the financial lifeline the federal government has offered the companies -- $17.4 billion in loans -- could be reeled in, potentially pushing the companies to seek bankruptcy protection.

However, union leaders at GM -- and at Chrysler, where parallel discussions are underway -- might not be in a hurry to reach an agreement. Some are hopeful that the incoming Obama administration will rewrite the controversial loan agreement and rescind the requirement that worker compensation be reduced.

Many union leaders, who supported Obama's candidacy, view Obama's decision on this issue as the first major test of the incoming administration's sympathy with labor groups.

"I'm still reasonably optimistic that the Obama administration will loosen up some of those restrictions," said Ken Lewenza, president of the Canadian Auto Workers union, whose members will be affected by any U.S. agreement, albeit indirectly.

GM officials expressed optimism that the two sides could reach an agreement; for now they are proceeding under the assumption that the terms won't change.

"We have a good relationship and everyone is on the same page," said Gary Cowger, GM vice president of global manufacturing and labor. "We're in continued discussions. And if you look at the track record we've done a lot in the past three years."

In crafting the loans to the auto companies last month, Bush administration officials placed demands on GM and Chrysler intended to make the domestic industry viable, more energy efficient and competitive with foreign automakers.

By Feb. 17, the companies must submit a viability plan, which includes a reduction of debt, as well as an agreement with the union. GM is also pushing to shrink the number of its dealerships and brands.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2009 The Washington Post Company