» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
Analysis

Geithner Plan Lacks Freshness And Clarity

Paulson's Criticized Path Is Followed

Video
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner on Tuesday outlined plans to increase consumer lending and remove toxic assets from banks' balance sheets. But analysts said they were disappointed by the lack of details in the plans.
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 11, 2009; Page D01

In rolling out his overhaul of the financial rescue yesterday, Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner lambasted the Bush administration's response to the crisis over the past year.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

"Policy was always behind the curve, always chasing the escalating crisis," Geithner said, criticizing his predecessor, Henry M. Paulson Jr. "The emergency actions meant to provide confidence and reassurance too often added to public anxiety and to investor uncertainty."

But yesterday, Geithner seemed to be following the Hank Paulson playbook, according to a wide consensus on Wall Street, in Washington, and beyond.

Many of the specific policies Geithner offered were tweaks, adjustments or continuations of Paulson's strategy. And the more novel elements of the Geithner plan -- the creation of an entity with public and private money to buy up bad assets from banks, a "stress test" of 20 or so of the nation's largest banks, and $50 billion to prevent foreclosures -- came with so few details about how they would work that it contributed to the very public anxiety and investor uncertainty that Geithner criticized.

"The markets are looking for real clarity," said Desmond Lachman, a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, "and Geithner is very good at critiquing what went wrong in the last year, but just seems to be perpetuating it."

Some elements of the Geithner plan -- the ones that were unveiled with the most detail -- are direct continuations of rescue efforts undertaken by Paulson.

The Treasury and Federal Reserve, for example, announced in November $200 billion to jump-start lending for a wide range of consumer loans. Geithner played a major role in designing that program in his former job as president of the New York Fed, as did Steven Shafran, a Paulson aide whom Geithner has retained at Treasury. That program is being enlarged to as much as $1 trillion, and will be expanded to support commercial real estate and residential mortgage lending.

That expansion came as no surprise to Treasury-watchers, however. In announcing the original program, Paulson said in a speech, "The facility may be expanded over time and eligible asset classes may be expanded later to include other assets, such as commercial mortgage-backed securities, non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities or other asset classes."

The newer components of Geithner's bailout program have yet to be fleshed out.

Among them is the creation of a public-private fund to buy up distressed assets on the balance sheets of banks so they have the freedom to resume lending, which in turn can help stimulate the wider economy.

Geithner intends to solve the nettlesome question of how to price them by having private investors put up capital and decide what to buy and for how much. But Treasury officials deflected most questions on how the new fund would be structured, saying that they were laying out only a broad framework and that much work is left to be done.

Geithner also pledged that bank regulators would begin conducting stress tests of banks with more than $100 billion in assets to figure out what would happen to their financial positions if the economy keeps deteriorating rapidly. The results of that review would determine which banks would be pushed to raise new capital from the private markets, or, if they are unable, from the government.


CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2009 The Washington Post Company