» This Story:Read +| Comments
MARKET BUZZ

Maybe It Wasn't Such a Capital Idea

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Sunday, February 22, 2009; Page F02

Wall Street is acting like a nervous kid in a haunted house: jumping out of his skin every time someone says "Boo!"

This Story

Last week, the scary word was "nationalization," a government takeover of a business or industry. It's pretty much the worst fear of every capitalist.

A number of the nation's biggest banks -- Citigroup and Bank of America, chiefly -- are sick, their balance sheets poisoned with toxic assets they can't unload, such as mortgage-backed securities.

They are so sick that Sen. Christopher Dodd (D-Conn.), the powerful head of the Senate Banking committee, nearly sent them into cardiac arrest on Friday with a comment he made.

A little after 1 p.m. on Friday, while speaking on Bloomberg television, Dodd said that nationalization of some of the nation's unhealthiest banks may be necessary "for a short time."

"I don't welcome that at all, but I could see how it's possible it may happen," Dodd said.

It's usually a mistake to link market fluctuations to moment-by-moment news.

Not this time.

The Dow Jones industrial average and the Standard & Poor's 500 instantly dove nearly 3 percent following Dodd's comments.

That's not the worst of it: Shares of Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo responded to Dodd's comments by each dropping a staggering 25 percent within minutes.

Dodd's comment was so potent, the White House felt compelled to chime in quickly, saying "a privately held banking system is the correct way to go."

Naturally, in response, the markets ricocheted back up, as did bank stocks, more than recovering their losses, at least for a time.

What does this mean for you?

Well, unless you're a moment-by-moment, live-on-the-edge-of-your-seat day-trader, financial stocks remain a volatile play at least until Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner releases more details of his bank bailout plan, perhaps as early as this week.

How volatile? If you had bought Bank of America at 1:17 p.m. on Friday and sold it at 2:51 p.m., your investment would have grown 30 percent. But if you'd bought it at 10:07 a.m. and sold it at 1:17 p.m., you would have lost 28 percent.

Now, that's scary. But if there's one good thing about a haunted house, it's this: There's always a way out.

-- Frank Ahrens


» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2009 The Washington Post Company