» This Story:Read +|Watch +|Talk +| Comments

Obama's Order on Stem Cells Leaves Key Questions to NIH

Video
President Obama ended the ban on federal funding of stem cell research in a White House ceremony Monday. Video by AP
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Rob Stein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, March 10, 2009

President Obama's open-ended order lifting limits on federal funding for stem cell research raises the prospect that taxpayer money could be used for a much broader, much more controversial array of studies than many scientists, officials and activists anticipated.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

Although the decision to allow expanded funding had been long expected, many thought Obama would limit federally funded scientists to working with cell lines derived from embryos destined to be discarded at infertility clinics. Instead, he left that key issue open.

The task of deciding what kinds of studies will be supported now falls to the National Institutes of Health, which finds itself confronting far more extensive questions than its officials were contemplating. It has 120 days to do the job.

Among other things, officials will have to decide whether to endorse studies on cells obtained from much more contentious sources, such as embryos created specifically for research or by means of cloning techniques.

"He left it wide open," said Thomas H. Murray, director of the Hastings Center, a bioethics think tank. "Now we are going to have to face a host of morally complicated, politically charged questions. There's not an easy path forward for them out of here."

Richard Doerflinger of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, a leading opponent of embryonic stem cell research, said, "If they go beyond the so-called spare embryos in fertility clinics, they are breaching an entirely new ethical line."

Obama acknowledged yesterday that the field raises many difficult questions and stressed that strong safeguards would be put in place. He made a point of condemning the most provocative concern -- that the research could somehow lead to cloning human beings.

"We will ensure that our government never opens the door to the use of cloning for human reproduction," Obama said. "It is dangerous, profoundly wrong and has no place in our society or any society."

Many scientists think that research on embryonic stem cells may lead to cures for a host of diseases because of the cells' ability to morph into any type of cell in the body. But critics oppose the research because the cells are derived by destroying embryos, which they consider to be immoral.

To prevent taxpayer money from encouraging the destruction of embryos, President George. W. Bush on Aug. 9, 2001, limited federal funding to those cell lines already in existence as of that date. That policy has long been opposed by scientists, patient advocates and others, who say the restriction stifled advances in one of the most promising medical fields in generations.

In anticipation of Obama's decision, the NIH had begun drafting guidelines assuming that funding would be limited to lines from embryos discarded after in vitro fertilization. That is what officials had proposed during President Bill Clinton's administration and what would be accomplished under legislation Congress passed twice and will consider again.

But proponents of the research had hoped that Obama's order would be free of caveats, fulfilling his promise to leave such decisions to scientists. Obama cast his decision that way, coupling it with an order aimed at removing politics from scientific decisions across the government.


CONTINUED     1        >


» This Story:Read +|Watch +|Talk +| Comments

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2009 The Washington Post Company