» This Story:Read +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments
Archive   |   Biography   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home

Where the Angriest Words Can Lead

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Saturday, June 6, 2009

"I hope you're satisfied," the caller said. She identified herself as the wife of a D.C. government official taken to task in a Post editorial for a bad decision he had made on the job. "My husband just received word that he has been fired," she said. "An honorable career down the drain."

This Story
This Story

"You have," she said, "turned our lives upside down . . . Our daughter's wedding now has to be canceled because we can't pay for it."

"I hope you're satisfied," she said once again.

I wasn't satisfied. I was stunned, sorry for what had happened to her family and disturbed by the disruption in her daughter's life, and I fumbled for words to express my concern for their welfare.

It was, however, his decision, and not the editorial, that got him in trouble. It was his D.C. government superior, and not the editorial, that decided he should be laid off. There was no reason to censure his dismissal, either; he should have been fired.

Still, I wasn't untouched.

I could not, with wide-eyed innocence, pretend that the harsh editorial had no impact on her husband's fate. I felt then, and I believe now, that I could not be absolved of what happened to him. The editorial may have had a bearing on the outcome.

Words have consequences -- a lesson I've learned, and relearned, after nearly 20 years of editorial and column writing.

Which makes Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly all the more unbelievable when he holds himself harmless in creating the atmosphere that helped diminish the humanity of George Tiller, the Kansas doctor who performed late-term abortions.

O'Reilly used his show, "The O'Reilly Factor," to demonize Tiller.

A few of his words, as reported by Salon.com: Tiller "destroys fetuses for just about any reason right up until the birthdate for $5,000." Then-Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius "doesn't seem to be real upset about this guy operating a death mill, which is exactly what it is, in her state, does she?" And: "No question Dr. Tiller has blood on his hands."

No calls to murder, for sure. And certainly no license for the suspect in Tiller's death, Scott Roeder, to gun down the doctor last Sunday during services at a Wichita church.


CONTINUED     1           >


» This Story:Read +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2009 The Washington Post Company