» This Story:Read +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments
Archive   |   Biography   |   E.J.'s Precinct   |   RSS Feed   |   Opinions Home

'Obamacized' Virginia?

Creigh Deeds Will Test a Victory's Durability

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Thursday, June 11, 2009

CHARLOTTESVILLE -- It was the unscripted, unpolished and precisely appropriate response from a candidate who a few weeks ago had been expected to lose and instead won a landslide victory.

This Story
This Story

In Virginia's Democratic primary for governor, R. Creigh Deeds, a state senator from rural Bath County, had just upended Terry McAuliffe, the Democratic Party's one-man money machine whose unbridled enthusiasm might someday make him a useful source of alternative energy.

Deeds, wearing a grin bigger than Thomas Jefferson's Monticello mansion down the road, looked at the friendly home crowd here on Tuesday night and spoke a single word.

"Wow!" he said, and then he repeated it, and repeated it again.

Underdogs have a natural appeal, and Democrats are lucky that Deeds will lead them in one of the country's two gubernatorial elections this year. A small-town moderate who speaks with a twang and ran strongest in the most Republican parts of the state, he will not be easily caricatured as a creature of national politics.

And to preserve a sense of political momentum, President Obama needs at least one Democratic win this fall either here or in New Jersey, where his party's incumbent, Jon Corzine, is well financed but embattled.

Of course, both elections will be hyped beyond their actual implications for national politics, but there is the substantive question of whether Obama's magic can prevail when he is not on the ballot. The legions of new voters he brought to the polls allowed Democrats to sweep in 2008, yet it was also a deeply personal triumph, and Obama is running a highly personalized presidency.

"One of the questions coming out of last year," said Geoffrey Garin, a Democratic pollster, "is whether the new voters have been Obamacized or politicized. There's a lot of evidence that a lot of the Democrats who were extremely enthusiastic and energized in 2008 were really focused on Obama as opposed to politics more broadly."

Virginia is a case in point. The 2008 turnout here was up by more than 500,000 over 2004 turnout. John McCain got more votes than George W. Bush did four years earlier -- and lost the state by more than 200,000.

Young people were the key. According to a reanalysis of the 2008 exit poll, 24 percent of Obama's Virginia ballots came from voters younger than 30 (compared with 18 percent of McCain's). Most of Obama's victory margin was provided by these young voters.

Can Deeds produce a sufficient surge when he faces Republican Attorney General Bob McDonnell in the fall?

The troubling news for Democrats is that turnout in Tuesday's Virginia primary was anemic by most standards -- just over 6 percent of eligible voters -- though this year's contest did bring more voters to the polls than a 2006 U.S. Senate primary that propelled Democrat Jim Webb to victory.


CONTINUED     1        >


» This Story:Read +| Comments
» This Story:Read +| Comments

More Washington Post Opinions

PostPartisan

Post Partisan

Quick takes from The Post's opinion writers.

Washington Sketch

Washington Sketch

Dana Milbank writes about political theater in the capital.

Tom Toles

Tom Toles

See his latest editorial cartoon.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company