» This Story:Read +|Watch +|Talk +| Comments

Reaching Critical Mess

As Blockbuster, 'Transformers' Spotlights Chasm Between Rabid Audience and Savage Reviewers

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 1, 2009

The critics spoke last Friday. "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" is a Hindenberg of a movie.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

The audience responded: So freakin' what? They forked over $215 million (and counting) to see the widely panned sequel about shape-shifting robots. It became only the second movie after last year's "The Dark Knight" to make that much in its first five days. "Transformers 2" was director Michael Bay's worst-reviewed movie -- worse than 2001's "Pearl Harbor."

"A horrible experience of unbearable length," wrote Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times.

"Striking, shrieking incoherence," wrote Peter Travers in Rolling Stone.

"I think they reviewed the wrong movie," Bay told the Los Angeles Times. Critics "just don't understand the movie and its audience. It's silly fun. I am convinced that they are born with the anti-fun gene."

Not that it matters, though. For decades, summer blockbusters have vacuumed up people's money in spite of how bad the reviews are.

"Critics don't affect the box office," says Brandon Gray, president of Box Office Mojo. "The bottom line is it's about the premise of the movies and how they're marketed. 'Transformers' is assembled in a way to appeal to as many people as possible. It has all the scenes and plot devices -- well, not plot, actually -- that worked in the past."

But there's something astounding about the gap between "Transformers' " voluminous receipts and excoriating reviews.

"It's not a gap -- it's a chasm. It's interplanetary space," says Joe Morgenstern, film critic for the Wall Street Journal, who called the sequel "appalling." "The truth is, most summer movies these days are made to be critic-proof."

After reading Morgenstern's review, one online commenter provided further context: "I want to see things blowing up, alien robots battling each other, and . . . of course, Megan Fox." (She's the pornstarrific eye-candy amid all the whirling gadgetry.)

Entertainment Weekly critic Owen Gleiberman gave the film one of its few positive reviews, likening its appeal to that of a giant-monster movie like "Godzilla." He says Michael Bay has become the official whipping boy for critics -- unfairly held up as everything that's wrong with Hollywood. The reviews of "Transformers 2," he says, are as guilty of excess as the movie itself.

"I don't defend it as a piece of storytelling, but I think it's a lot more fun than a lot of weak stories I've seen."

CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +|Talk +| Comments
© 2009 The Washington Post Company