» This Story:Read +| Comments
THE DISTRICT

Ex-Judge's Lawsuit Thrown Out

Pants Plaintiff Wanted Job Back

Roy L. Pearson Jr., who previously sued his dry cleaners, filed suit in 2008 alleging that the D.C. government broke the law in refusing to reappoint him.
Roy L. Pearson Jr., who previously sued his dry cleaners, filed suit in 2008 alleging that the D.C. government broke the law in refusing to reappoint him. (2007 Photo By Jacquelyn Martin -- Associated Press)
  Enlarge Photo    
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, July 29, 2009

A federal judge has thrown out a lawsuit brought by Roy L. Pearson Jr., the former D.C. administrative law judge whose $54 million lawsuit against a dry-cleaning business generated international headlines.

This Story

Pearson filed the suit in May 2008, alleging that the D.C. government broke the law in refusing to reappoint him to a 10-year term as an administrative law judge.

The decision not to reappoint Pearson followed media reports describing Pearson's lawsuit against Custom Cleaners, which he claimed had misplaced a pair of his pants.

The District's Commission on Selection and Tenure of Administrative Law Judges cited Pearson's temperament and prudence on the bench in not giving him the job. Administrative law judges hear cases involving city agencies and commissions.

In his lawsuit filed in the District's federal court, Pearson alleged that the commission was retaliating against him for exposing internal problems to the D.C. Council and for filing his lawsuit against Custom Cleaners. Both actions, Pearson said, were protected by the First Amendment. He also claimed that the commission did not give him a fair chance to fight its decision.

In a 37-page opinion issued Thursday, U.S. District Judge Ellen S. Huvelle rejected all of Pearson's arguments. She characterized Pearson's lawsuit against Custom Cleaners as a "personal vendetta."

Pearson, who represented himself in federal court, also lost his lawsuit against the owners of Custom Cleaners, which closed under the weight of legal bills. He could not be located for comment Tuesday.



» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the D.C. Section

Fixing D.C. Schools

Fixing D.C. Schools

The Washington Post investigates the state of the schools and the lessons of failed and successful reforms.

Neighborhoods

Neighborhoods

Use Neighborhoods to learn about Washington, D.C., Maryland and Virginia communities.

Top High Schools

Top High Schools

Jay Mathews identifies the nation's most challenging high schools and explains why they're best.

FOLLOW METRO ON:
Facebook Twitter RSS
|
GET LOCAL ALERTS:
© 2009 The Washington Post Company