» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

In the NHL's 'war room,' they know who's been bad

Toronto replay room keeps watchful eye over entire league

From disputed goals to questionable hits, everything that happens on the ice is reviewed in a windowless room in downtown Toronto.
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, December 9, 2009

TORONTO -- Midway through the first period of a game last month, Washington Capitals winger Chris Clark raced to the Ottawa Senators' net in search of a scoring chance.

This Story

Unable to get his stick on a pass from teammate Brian Pothier, Clark knocked the puck into the net with his left skate for a goal -- maybe. There was uncertainty as to whether Clark redirected the puck or kicked it into the net. If he kicked it, the goal wouldn't count.

Referee Marc Joannette skated over to the officials' box and put on his headset to get a ruling. The person making the decision, however, hadn't seen the goal live, and wasn't even in the same city, but rather nearly 300 miles away, watching slow-motion replays from a cramped, windowless office in downtown Toronto.

Before Clark's goal counted on the scoresheet -- it was determined that there was no "distinct kicking motion" -- the play was reviewed in the league's video replay room, where every game is always on. The smell of pepperoni pizza sometimes permeates the place, which resembles a fantasy hockey geek's dream den. The "war room," as it's often called, is small, measuring only 12 by 36 feet, but the decisions made there loom large.

The NHL began using video replay in 1991, but until six years ago, reviews of disputed goals were carried out by part-time, off-ice officials in each arena.

The replay system was moved to Toronto prior to the 2003-04 season at the urging of the league's general managers, who sought greater consistency on reviewed goals, particularly those suspected of being kicked into the net.

NHL vice presidents Colin Campbell and Mike Murphy and their team make the final rulings on goals by watching the plays, rewinding, then watching again, sometimes utilizing as many as eight camera angles. Murphy estimates that 400 goals in 1,230 games are reviewed each season.

"We try to get a consensus," he said.

Now, the league has "hockey men making the decisions," Capitals General Manager McPhee said, "and it's the same men making the decisions for all arenas."

Like most general managers, McPhee doesn't always agree with the decisions made in Toronto, whether it's a disputed goal or a controversial suspension.

Then again, he said, "it's a difficult job."

The dean of discipline

Questionable goals are only a fraction of what's under scrutiny in the war room.

CONTINUED     1           >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

More in the Capitals Section

Capitals Insider

Capitals Insider

The Post's Tarik El-Bashir provides exclusive analysis and updates you with all of the latest Capitals news.

Alex Ovechkin

Goal Oriented

Alex Ovechkin could become the greatest player in hockey, thanks to his mother.

© 2009 The Washington Post Company