For emergency medical teams, time and coordination are of the essence in Haiti

This gallery collects all of our photos of the crisis in Haiti, starting with the most recent images and going back to the first photos that emerged after an earthquake hit the impoverished nation Jan. 12.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 15, 2010

The medical relief teams racing to help victims of the earthquake in Haiti are up against a grim biological fact: People trapped and injured are most likely to survive if rescued within 48 hours, and very few people are found alive more than six days after a disaster.

The rare people who are rescued much later often need treatment -- kidney dialysis, intensive-care nursing and cardiovascular support -- that is singularly hard to deliver in disaster zones.

Yet, the landscape of many recent natural disasters has featured not only wreckage and bodies, but also the high-tech encampments of surgical teams that arrived too late to be of much use while many more ordinary medical needs continued to go unaddressed.

"The real issue is you have to know what is going to be needed at the time you can realistically arrive and be ready to operate your medical resource," said Joseph A. Barbera, an emergency physician and co-director of George Washington University's Institute for Crisis, Disaster and Risk Management.

He left Thursday as part of a team from the Fairfax County urban search and rescue squad, one of the few relief organizations with experience treating victims of "crush syndrome" in disaster zones. People suffering from that problem can die within minutes of being rescued unless specific treatment -- often begun before the debris is lifted -- is performed.

The flood of uncoordinated "medical assets" was particularly dramatic after the Indian Ocean tsunami in December 2004. It was one reason the World Health Organization offers unusually blunt advice to medical do-gooders.

The Geneva-based organization's Web site lists under "inappropriate response" to earthquakes:

"Medical or paramedical personnel or teams: Do not send them! They would arrive too late. Local and neighbouring health services are best placed to handle emergency medical care to disaster victims. Field hospitals, modular medical units: Do not send them!"

Whether that advice is appropriate at the moment for Haiti -- a country with a poor medical system (much of it now damaged) and a population with high rates of illness and poor nutrition -- is unclear. It is not stopping relief organizations and charities from sending physicians, nurses, logistics experts, publicists and supplies.

A spokesman for the Health Action in Crises section at WHO said Thursday that no organization has been explicitly told not to go to Haiti. He said, however, that there is far more coordination now than in earlier disasters.

"We are not actively discouraging, but we are advising and we're not seeing uncoordinated, dysfunctional and over-the-top provision of supplies and care," Paul Garwood said. "Since the tsunami, there has been a huge reform of humanitarian work in emergencies."

The coordination is being done by a "health cluster" whose 80 members include U.N. agencies, large nongovernmental organizations and charities with health expertise. A WHO physician is scheduled to arrive in Port-au-Prince on Friday to lead the cluster, Garwood said.

CONTINUED     1        >

© 2010 The Washington Post Company