2010 Mitsubishi Outlander XLS review: Only a fair-weather friend

2010 Mitsubishi Outlander XLS
2010 Mitsubishi Outlander XLS (Photo courtesy of Mitsubishi)
Sunday, February 7, 2010

CORNWALL, N.Y. The drive turned nasty on northbound Interstate 87, where strong crosswinds, sleet and light snow joined in ridicule of Mitsubishi's advertising claims.

The butts of the joke were me and the 2010 Mitsubishi Outlander XLS crossover utility vehicle, which waved back and forth in the manner of a kite's tail. I hadn't expected that, having fallen for the joy of an inapplicable memory.

I had last driven an Outlander in 2003, the year of its introduction in the United States. I was impressed. It behaved beautifully, had myriad amenities and was put together as well as several of its more expensive rivals.

But the weather was nice that week in 2003. It was the dawn of spring in Virginia's Shenandoah Valley -- one of my favorite places to be at my favorite time to be there. Love was abloom. I applied that emotion in large measure to the Outlander.

Saying yes to the 2010 Outlander was easy when it came around, although it came with winter storm warnings throughout the East Coast.

But I was overconfident in the Outlander XLS crossover's Super All Wheel Control (S-AWC) drive system, supposedly one of the best all-wheel-drive arrangements in the motoring world. Also, I was overconfident in my driving skills.

I have a friend, Lou Ann Hammond, an automotive writer in Northern California, who always advises her colleagues, "Don't drive faster than your angels can fly." She has a corollary: "Using your head is better than losing your butt."

I should have listened. But Mitsubishi's S-AWC drive system was so seductive -- especially in print and on roads uncompromised by strong winds and ice. I didn't listen and almost lost my butt -- several times.

I'll reflect more on one of those near-misses later. But first, I'll share some information on Mitsubishi's S-AWC drive system:

It is a good all-wheel-drive arrangement, arguably one of the best available. It uses an electronically controlled active front differential in tandem with electronic traction and stability control to shift power left to right, wheel to wheel. As such, S-AWC balances the Outlander's weight shifts, allowing greater acceleration in turning corners and reducing the chances of slipping and toppling.

S-AWC works well. But it can't and won't override the laws of physics. A slippery, icy road is a slippery, icy road. A strong wind is a strong wind. The two together will upset any vehicle, regardless of size, technology, engineering or build quality.

The Outlander XLS got pushed around -- badly. Its rear end swung out of sync several times, once strongly aided by the wind, which moved it rightward over an icy patch of I-87 toward the shoulder of the road. Luckily, I chose to hug a right lane where traffic was sparse. But keeping the Outlander upright and moving in a straight line in that windy, wintry mix proved far more difficult than I would have ever imagined.

The experience taught me several lessons. One, too many automotive advertisements don't deal with reality. All of the on-air braggadocio about how well one car or another could run in snow or other bad weather is braggadocio -- and dangerous braggadocio at that. Sometimes, as Lou Ann suggests, it's better to keep your engine off, your butt off the road and stay put.

Lesson two: No car company anywhere can make a car, truck, SUV or crossover utility vehicle that can trump Mother Nature at her most brutal. If you doubt that, check the Department of Transportation's Fatality Analysis Reporting System. The charts are filled with her victims. I almost became one of them.

Brown is a special correspondent.

© 2010 The Washington Post Company