» This Story:Read +| Comments

Cuccinelli comes out swinging, vows to file lawsuit to challenge health-care bill

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
By Rosalind Helderman
Monday, March 22, 2010; 11:13 AM

To emphasize how ready Virginia is to take the health care overhaul to court, take a look at this tweet from Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli this morning:

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

"Well, they did it. Once the president signs it into law, we'll walk across the street and file suit b/c the ind mandate is unconstitutional"

We eagerly await a look at the filings penned by Cuccinelli's office. But in a lengthy interview on the topic late last week, Cucccinelli indicated he would argue -- as his tweet suggests -- that requiring individuals to purchase health care exceeds the federal government's authority to regulate interstate commerce.

He also said that requiring states to participate in a health insurance exchange, as envisioned by the bill, violates state sovereignty.

Cuccinelli said then that he was getting "overwhelmingly positive" e-mails and calls in response to his forcefulness on the issue. It's also made him something of a national voice of pushback from states on the bill -- he's been all over national cable news since last week.

"We'll see how it plays out. Whether [response to] a lawsuit is positive or not isn't terribly relevant. What matters is if you're right on the law. Ultimately, a court will decide if they press ahead. I think we have a very strong case," he said.

He said he was "perfectly sensitive to the notion" that public sentiment can change over time.

"That hasn't been a basis for our decision. As it hasn't been on some other things," he said chuckling, a reference to the uproar sparked when he sent letters recently to Virginia's colleges and universities informing them it was his legal opinion campus nondiscrimination policies could not legally include reference to sexual orientation.

"An attorney general who held my position and had done the legal research we've done could just do nothing and lament the process. If you do something -- and I didn't get elected not to do something -- you have to act consistently with your legal conclusions. My first obligation is to defend the constitution of the United States and of Virginia," he said.

"We have tried to make it clear before hand what we anticipated we would do. We're not trying to sandbag anybody. And it's not like I'm unique in the United States of America. There are other attorneys general who are talking about this."

» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the Metro Section

Local Blog Directory

Find a Local Blog

Plug into the region's blogs, by location or area of interest.

Virginia Politics

Blog: Va. Politics

Here's a place to help you keep up with Virginia's overcaffeinated political culture.

D.C. Taxi Fares

D.C. Taxi Fares

Compare estimated zoned and metered D.C. taxi fares with this interactive calculator.

Facebook Twitter RSS
© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity