» This Story:Read +| Comments

Attorney General Eric Holder stands his ground at Senate hearing

Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, April 15, 2010

Senators challenged Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. on Wednesday over the Obama administration's long-delayed pledge to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay and its plans to try alleged Sept. 11 co-conspirators. But Holder conceded little and emerged from the session mostly unscathed.

This Story

Holder has been assailed for months over his handling of terrorism cases. Four weeks ago, he snapped to House Republicans that Osama bin Laden would never appear in a U.S. courtroom and that authorities "will be reading Miranda rights to a corpse." That heightened the expectation that Holder would face a grilling from the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

But the attorney general held his ground or side-stepped most hostile questions from Republicans, and he managed in a controlled, cautious appearance to do little new damage to his political standing on Capitol Hill or with the White House, aides said.

Holder used his 3 1/2 -hour testimony -- his first before the committee since the collapse of his plan to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed and four other alleged Sept. 11 plotters in federal court in New York City -- to dig himself out of more recent controversies.

He said that the United States still hopes to capture and interrogate bin Laden, but added that it was "highly unlikely" that the al-Qaeda leader would be taken alive, given what is known about his instructions to his security forces.

Holder also defended the decision to bring civilian criminal charges against Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, accused of attempting to bomb an airliner on Christmas. That decision has been "shown to be the right one," he said, citing information provided by the Nigerian since he began cooperating with the federal government after his arrest.

Senior administration officials have privately expressed dismay about Holder's job performance, saying he has displayed a tin ear in his decision-making and his public remarks. That has prompted predictions that he might not last much longer, but Holder has shown no signs of getting ready to leave, and he remains a close friend of President Obama's, advisers said. If anything, his careful statements Wednesday seemed to suggest that he is adapting to the White House's desire that he make less news.

Holder said it would be a "number of weeks" before the White House-led review of his decision to try Sept. 11 suspects is concluded. He also insisted that officials have not ruled out New York as a site for the trials.

"New York is not off the table," Holder said. "The Southern District of New York, for instance, is a much larger place than simply Manhattan."

The remark prompted exasperation even from Democrats.

"We know the administration is not going to hold the trial in New York. They should just say it already," said Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.).

Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin (D-Md.) expressed impatience with the administration's indecision on how it would indefinitely detain subjects whom it cannot prosecute because of the nature of the evidence against them, but who are deemed too dangerous to release.


CONTINUED     1        >


» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2010 The Washington Post Company