» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

Radicalization of Times Square suspect was gradual, investigators say

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, May 7, 2010

The suspect in the attempted Times Square bombing appears to have been acting out of anger toward the United States that had accumulated over multiple trips to his native Pakistan, culminating in a lengthy recent stay in which he committed to the bombing plot while undergoing training with elements of the Pakistani Taliban, U.S. officials said Thursday.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

U.S. officials said Faisal Shahzad's radicalization was cumulative and largely self-contained -- meaning that it did not involve typical catalysts such as direct contact with a radical cleric, a visible conversion to militant Islam or a significant setback in life.

U.S. officials said they are assembling a portrait of Shahzad -- based in part on the account he has given interrogators -- that may help explain why he attracted scant scrutiny during his transition from student and young father in the Connecticut suburbs to the man accused of parking a vehicle packed with explosives in Times Square.

Shahzad's transition "was a gradual thing that started years ago," said a senior U.S. intelligence official with access to interrogation reports from the probe. "It wasn't suddenly, 'I found God, and this is the right path.' There is a combination of religion and anger."

The official noted that Shahzad had made at least a dozen return trips to Pakistan since arriving in the United States in 1999 and that the CIA's campaign of Predator strikes and Pakistan's recent military operations are focused on a part of the country very close to where Shahzad grew up.

Officials stressed that investigators are still struggling to come up with a cohesive account of how Shahzad evolved into a would-be terrorist but that they are increasingly convinced that his accounts to interrogators, in particular his assertion that he was trained by the Pakistani Taliban, are on the mark. It is still unclear whether the militant group mainly known for strikes inside Pakistan went beyond training Shahzad to conceiving or carrying out the plot.

"We have nothing that is contradictory to what he is telling us," said a senior Obama administration official, adding that undisclosed new information from Shahzad's interrogation "sheds some light" on his motivation.

The investigation has turned up tenuous links between Shahzad and high-profile figures of jihad. A U.S. official said Shahzad was associated with at least one individual who was in contact with Anwar al-Aulaqi, the American-born cleric in Yemen who has been tied to the suspect in the attempted Christmas bombing on a Detroit-bound plane as well as the man charged in last year's fatal shootings at Fort Hood, Tex.

A senior law enforcement official said that Shahzad told interrogators he had watched Aulaqi's videos on the Web and that he indicated the cleric had inspired him. Shahzad himself does not appear to have communicated with Aulaqi, who is known for his online postings advocating violence against the West.

Investigators are examining the significance of large sums of money that Shahzad brought into the United States. Between 1999 and 2008, Shahzad declared $80,000 in cash when he returned from various trips overseas, said another law enforcement official familiar with the investigation. Under federal law, anyone bringing $10,000 or more into the country must note the amount on a customs declaration form.

"Obviously, we want to see if there are any links, especially recently," to terrorist groups, said the official. "Terrorists know banks are being watched, so are they moving bulk cash to finance their operations?" The official added that it is not unusual for immigrants -- particularly those like Shahzad who come from well-heeled families overseas -- to travel to the United States with stacks of currency.

The money complicates another line of inquiry: whether financial trouble played a role in Shahzad's radicalization. Shahzad abruptly quit his job at a financial marketing firm last June, when he and his wife and two children vacated their Connecticut home, moved overseas and stopped making payments on their mortgage.


CONTINUED     1        >


» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity