» This Story:Read +| Comments

Gray, Fenty scramble for ethical high ground in D.C. mayoral race

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, July 23, 2010

What's in a "crony"?

For D.C. Council Chairman Vincent C. Gray, that word is the centerpiece of a campaign assault on Mayor Adrian M. Fenty.

This Story

His slogan is "Character. Integrity. Leadership." His Web site has a page devoted to "Restoring the Public Trust." He hasn't been shy about slinging words such as "sweetheart deals" in stump speeches, fundraising letters and candidate forums.

"It seems like every day there's another story in the newspaper about mismanaged public dollars and shady deals," the Web page reads.

Just as telling was last week's heated Fenty-Gray debate on WPFW (89.3 FM). Toward the end of an hour-long battle that digressed more often than not into ethical recriminations, host Jonetta Rose Barras asked the dueling Democrats to ask each other a question.

Fenty asked Gray why he won't give a yes-or-no answer to whether he'd keep Schools Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee if elected.

Gray asked Fenty: "Why did he support $82 million in contracts being given to his fraternity brothers through a surreptitious and clandestine and circuitous route through the Housing Authority?"

That is the WMD in Gray's ethical arsenal: parks and recreation spending directed through the Housing Authority to be distributed, without council scrutiny, by firms run by Fenty allies.

Fenty has not apologized and maintains that the contracts were legal. Investigations by the inspector general's office and an independent attorney appointed by the council are ongoing and unlikely to be completed before the Sept. 14 primary. No one has alleged that the work hasn't gotten done on time. But there are questions about the way the contracts were awarded and the price the city is paying for the work.

Meanwhile, the Fenty campaign has been preoccupied with painting Gray as a creature of the old school, a feckless bureaucrat who as human services director in the early 1990s helped lead the city into fiscal ruin.

But Gray's been able to flip that script. Behold: "What's taking us back again is the cronyism that we've seen," he said on WPFW. "Contracts being given to fraternity brothers, other elements of this that people would have associated with yesteryear."

It doesn't help that Fenty has done nothing to distance himself from the "cronies" of whom Gray speaks. Fraternity brother Omar Karim, whose Banneker Ventures oversaw the parks spending, proudly appeared at Fenty's State of the District address and at the Deanwood Rec Center groundbreaking. Contract recipient Sinclair Skinner is a fixture of the Fenty campaign. And Fenty has publicly praised Ron Moten -- the Peaceoholics founder and bare-knuckle "brawler" who benefited from millions in city contracts under Fenty -- as a "great Washingtonian."

CONTINUED     1        >

» This Story:Read +| Comments
© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile
View More Activity