Carolyn Hax: Wedding plans hit snag in choice of church

Nick Galifianakis for The Washington Post
(Nick Galifianakis for The Washington Post)
  Enlarge Photo    
Monday, September 13, 2010

Adapted from a recent online discussion:

Dear Carolyn:

My fiance and I are planning a low-key wedding. To both of our surprise, his parents expressed a lot of concern about my family's religion and the possibility of a wedding held in that faith -- which is related to his family's religion. For what it's worth, one of my parents attends services, his parents do not, he and I do not.

I know it's defensive, but I can't help but feel personally criticized/rejected by his parents, and that they are making uninformed judgments about my family's (very mainstream) religion.

I'm also wary of his parents having veto power on our decisions. To choose a church of his parents' faith was always on the table, but now would feel like we're letting them make decisions for us and endorsing their prejudices. What is the right way to approach this? Vegas?? Thanks!

Atlanta

You and your fiance need to sit down and hear his parents out -- with your fiance taking the lead, stating plainly that you were both taken aback by their objections.

I think it's also important to say that you and your fiance are going to choose the church that suits the two of you, but you want the decision to be a fully informed one, which is why you're asking for details.

Maybe they'll just dig themselves deeper into a hole with you -- say, by refusing to elaborate on their position, or by attacking you, or by spewing stereotypes. That's always the risk with something like this.

But since you're already feeling hurt and defensive, you're not likely to come out with dramatically worse feelings than you already have, especially since face-to-face conversations tend to force people into being more agreeable in their choices of words. For these reasons, I think talking it out presents a fairly low risk, as long as you go into it with a sincere desire to understand your future in-laws.


CONTINUED     1        >


© 2010 The Washington Post Company