» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments
Post Politics
New home.
Still the best political coverage.

As Rangel demonstrates, shame no longer required after political wrongdoing

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi formally calls Rep. Rangel to the well of House to be informed of the censure. Rangel closed the proceeding with a one-minute address on the House floor.

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, December 4, 2010; 9:57 PM

In Washington, shame isn't what it used to be.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

That was the lesson of the showdown Thursday between Rep. Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.) and the rest of the House of Representatives. Rangel's colleagues voted overwhelmingly to censure him for ethics violations - a punishment that included a public scolding in the House chamber.

But Rangel didn't cooperate. The rebuke would only work if he felt ashamed.

And he didn't.

At a moment when previous censured legislators had cried, resigned or passed out, Rangel ambled to the lectern on the floor of the House and delivered a proud speech.

"In my heart, I truly feel good," he said.

Congress has long relied on shame to enforce its norms: rule-breaking members were driven out not by force, but by their own consciences and their embarrassed constituents.

But now - whether the reason is hyper-partisanship, or a fragmented society, or the fact that weeping looks terrible on television - shame seems to be losing its grip. Instead, legislators have learned to bully their way through scandal, ignoring their humiliation instead of accepting it.

If this idea had a face, it would be the smile that Rangel wore after his censure.

"If you show shame, or show an honest contriteness, that's likely to appear in a campaign commercial against you," said KC Johnson, a professor of history at Brooklyn College in New York. "The fact is that there's really no incentive to admit to any wrongdoing in this kind of environment."

Those who argued for Rangel's censure said they intended the unusually tough punishment to send the message that members would be held to a new, more stringent code of ethics.

Before him, just 22 people had ever been censured in the history of Congress. And they had received the punishment for crimes such as assault, bribery, payroll fraud and sexual misconduct.

CONTINUED     1           >

» This Story:Read +|Watch +| Comments

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2010 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile