» This Story:Read +| Comments
Post Politics
New home.
Still the best political coverage.

With spotlight, political conventions bring hassles for host cities

Network News

X Profile
View More Activity
Discussion Policy
Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 23, 2011; 11:48 PM

When the call finally came, middle-aged men pumped their fists in the air as dollar signs danced in their heads. After two failed attempts to nab the Republican National Convention, Tampa had gotten the nod for 2012. The local host committee was ready for the coveted spotlight, the financial windfall and even the dreaded drama that inevitably come with political conventions. Still, the headaches started a little sooner than expected.

This Story
View All Items in This Story
View Only Top Items in This Story

Within months of the announcement last May, it was apparent that the Republican National Committee's newly installed operation in Tampa was spending money wildly with little to show. Last month, new RNC chief Reince Priebus agreed, abruptly firing the party's Tampa staff. The dust-up generated ample publicity - but the not the kind Tampa had envisioned.

"Yes, it was a distraction," said Ken Jones, president of the Tampa Bay host committee. "It did not slow us down, though - we secured the venue, signed contracts, booked the hotels. But optically, it was a distraction."

As Tampa and Charlotte, the site of the 2012 Democratic convention, prepare to host upward of 50,000 visitors next year, the early euphoria has been eclipsed by the overwhelming reality of executing a massive, extraordinarily high-profile event with thousands of moving parts.

National political conventions can be a boon to a local community, often catapulting it onto the national and international stage. For five intense days, Tampa and Charlotte will host journalists and politicos, chief executives and presidents. Fifteen thousand hotel rooms will be occupied, thousands of jobs will be created, and the cities' skylines will be featured on the evening news.

But with the good fortune come huge hassles - messy fights over money, clashes with the national party committees and bickering with the staff of the eventual nominee. Add to that the inconvenience to residents as the city center is jammed by visitors, the loss of business to local establishments not involved in the festivities and the pressure on the community to raise $50 million for the extravaganza.

Although city officials tend to head into conventions anticipating a substantial economic boost, some research shows that the benefits may be overstated. A study by the economics department of Holy Cross College in Worcester, Mass., which looked at conventions from 1970 to 2005, concluded that a convention has "no discernible impact" on the local economy. The study argued that the big money ends up going to national businesses, such as hotel chains, and new jobs are short-lived.

"There's always this initial euphoria that this is going to be a jackpot - that everyone is going to make a gazillion dollars - and that is not true," said David Passafaro, president of the host committee for the Boston 2004 Democratic convention. In the end, the Boston committee had a surplus because, according to Passafaro, it resisted any pressure from the national party to spend money it did not have.

In fact, some cities in recent years have decided that the cost and political messiness just aren't worth it. Los Angeles declined an opportunity to bid for the 2008 convention. Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter did not have his city compete for the 2012 Democratic convention, and Orlando officials turned down an invitation from the GOP to bid. Both cities cited the extraordinary cost of hosting in a tough economic environment.

"It brings in tremendous revenues and exposure, but it's a very expensive endeavor," said Terry McAuliffe, former head of the Democratic National Committee.

Still, many cities are eager to host, knowing it could be a giant public relations boost. Officials in Atlanta believe that hosting the Democratic convention in 1988 helped the city land the 1994 Super Bowl, and then the biggest prize of all: the 1996 Olympic Games.

In its bid to host the Republican meeting in 1996, San Diego was desperate to repair its reputation after a brewing political scandal two decades earlier prompted the GOP to pull out just 90 days before the convention.


CONTINUED     1        >


» This Story:Read +| Comments

More in the Politics Section

Campaign Finance -- Presidential Race

2008 Fundraising

See who is giving to the '08 presidential candidates.

Latest Politics Blog Updates

© 2011 The Washington Post Company

Network News

X My Profile