Check frequently for dispatches from the courthouse.

Please be advised that this document is on Microsoft's Web site. For download purposes, Microsoft has made this document available in HTML and in Microsoft Word.

• Direct Testimony of Richard L. Schmalensee
  • I. Introduction
  • II. Competition in the Microcomputer Software Industry is Intense
  • III. Microsoft Has Faced and Continues to Face Competition from Other Platforms
  • IV. Internet Access is One of Many Features Microsoft Has Integrated in Windows
  • V. Consumers Have Benfited from Competition Between Microsoft and Netscape
  • VI. No Reliable Economic Evidence That Consumers or Competition Have Been Harmed
  • VII. Microsoft Does Not Have Market Power in Software Distribution
  • VIII. Microsoft's Agreements Did Not Exclude Netscape from Distrbuting Its Browser
  • IX. Microsoft Did Not Tie IE and Windows
  • X. Plaintiffs Have Provided No Reliable Evidence that Microsoft Engaged in Predation
  • XI. Plaintiffs' Propsed Remedies Would Result in Extensive Government Involvement
  • XII. Conclusions
  RLSCVA Appendix
  Price Appendix
  PreWindows Appendix
  Browser Appendix Web
  ICP Appendix
  Browser Review Appendix