Meet David Hoffman

Read David Hoffman's Post biography.
Read the latest news, features and analyses written by David Hoffman for the print editions of The Post.
Editor's Note:
This column is the first of what will be a periodic series of "letters from Moscow" written exclusively for Post.com by David Hoffman, The Post's Moscow bureau chief. These letters have not appeared in the print editions of The Post.
Go to Former Soviet Union Page
Go to Former Soviet Union Year End Review
Go to International Section
|
|
Rotting Soviet Leftovers Dominate Landscape of 'New Russia'
By David Hoffman
Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, Dec. 25, 1996.
MOSCOW -- Not long ago, I was visiting a government building in a Russian province,
heading up the stairs. Suddenly I felt a little disoriented, and I almost
lost my balance. Then I realized why. The marble steps were so badly worn
from use, they'd taken on deep depressions where people had worn away the
center of the step. It was like walking up the crazy stairs in a Haunted
House.
It happens often in Russia. The land is filled with broken old stairways,
many of them filthy and foreboding. In the images of political and economic
collapse that fill the news, it's often lost on outsiders that Russia is physically
crumbling as well. Especially outside Moscow and a few other cities, the
landscape tells a sad story. It is a horizon of despair.
Geography is central to how a people think of themselves and their
history. Russia is a vast unending plain. It can be a place of incredible
isolation. There are villages so far removed that they literally exist in
another era. Get on a train and as it pulls out of Moscow, you can feel
yourself being tugged inexorably deeper into another world, another
universe, another century.
The Russian landscape is also extraordinarily impersonal. It's partly the
physical hugeness of it. But it is also the legacy of the Soviet period. Everything was designed to make individuals feel small before the omnipotent power of
the state. Soviet decisions on how cities were built have not been erased just
because the Soviet state has disappeared. The designs remain, and they still
shape how millions of Russians see their world every day.
The cities are ringed by huge, shabby, prefab concrete apartment blocks.
These towers, foreboding in their sameness, usually meet the ground with
nothing more than a scraggly bush or tree to soften the stark appearance.
They overshadow the tiny, metal kiosks that dot the streets, lights burning
late into the night, selling cigarettes, liquor and video tapes.
Often you are confronted by the massive, beached whales of Soviet-era
commercial architecture. These are buildings which deliberately intimidate
the individual -- stores with vast plate-glass windows, expansive facades and
threatening overhangs. They are hulks. The plain-vanilla signs of the Soviet
days are still in place: Bread. Milk. Groceries. I'm sure the designers
never imagined they would one day be selling sleek Italian office furniture,
Japanese televisions and all sorts of washing machines inside.
In an earlier time, some long-forgotten Soviet planner had a bright idea.
He designed an iron-bar window grate with a semicircular "sun" in the corner
and the rays, or bars, streaming outward. This pattern is depressingly
repetitive in all of Russia. To me, it seems like the ultimate in
impersonal, cookie-cutter design -- like only window grate was
ever made. There was no choice, no deviation, no individual initiative. The
shining sun is everywhere, but the horizon is not so bright. I imagine most
people don't even notice it anymore, but it's another small piece of the
post-Soviet Russian tableau.
Whenever Russia gets off its knees -- and economically, the country is
still on its knees -- it will want to rebuild. This "re-generation" is
important not only for abstract ideas like democracy and free markets. It's
important for the landscape, too.
It's possible to glimpse that future now in some places in Moscow, where
there are glistening new parks and monuments, refurbished hotels, fancy
restaurants and brand new office towers. The killer potholes are being
filled, at least in the center of the city. Here, the hulking and crumbling
landscape is juxtaposed with a bright neon buzz that is part of the city's
hyper-activity. Residential buildings have entrances that are smelly, dark
dungeons, but sometimes the stairs lead down to spectacularly lavish and
private "clubs."
I know a teacher who has lived here for decades and says her neighborhood
looks better than ever before. There is even a new store, selling
home-repair goods, like do-it-yourself plumbing and shelves. But, she says,
she still hasn't gotten used to this brassy, flashy new store and the others
like it. Not only are they expensive, she says, but she just doesn't feel
comfortable in them. Also, if you need plumbing parts, you can buy them
cheaper on the street, in the makeshift open-air markets.
Russia's newly rich certainly have not been shy in flaunting their
wealth. They, too, are part of the contemporary landscape -- with massive
new country "dachas," three and four-story, out-sized country "cabins."
What's disturbing about them is not so much the garish architecture, but
that they are so obviously out of place, rising up above the traditional
village wooden houses.
Still, Moscow is an island. It is unlike just about any other place in
Russia. The rejuvenation of Moscow is about money: those who have it are
rebuilding, those who do not are left behind. The rest of Russia is rotting.
Why? First, remember that a huge mess was inherited from the Soviet
Union. The decay had set in long before the union collapsed, and the
impersonal design was deliberate. Since then, for five difficult years,
Russians have been trying to make a giant change, to try something
completely new: democracy and free markets. For most of them, the change has
been wrenching. It has demanded that everyone focus on survival. It has
demanded that bread-winners hold down two or three jobs at once. There is
not much time for them to go shopping in the do-it-yourself hardware store.
People are preoccupied with the stress that the new system has put on every
one of them, and not their surroundings.
Also, rebuilding Russia is a job for generations, not a few years. It's
an enormous, expensive task, and right now the country seems to have more
pressing needs. When there's not enough money to pay pensioners and
soldiers, when the state itself is crumbling at the core, it's hard to worry
about the crumbling landscape. That can come later.
How do people cope? Many just look inward. They retreat to their
apartments and slam the door. They don't worry about the mess in the
courtyard. Perhaps they don't even see it. All too often, the eye-catching
changes in the landscape are the unpleasant, in-your-face kind, such as the
five-story tall Marlboro man billboard in our neighborhood.
Surely, many Russians are embittered. It's especially acute when you see
the decay in museums, when you see the finest university in a state of
disrepair, when you show up at a once-esteemed research institute or
literary journal, and find yourself squeezed into a tiny closet because the
usable space has been given over to a shoe store. Like so much about today's
Russia, the landscape speaks to you, and it speaks of humiliation.
After a long while, when people stop working three jobs to feed their
families and can worry less about crime and corruption, when banks start
lending real money to industry and a middle class takes shape beyond just
Moscow, there should be a new landscape for a new Russia. One can hope there
will be.
© 1996 The Washington Post
Back to the Top
|