washingtonpost.com
Home   |   Register               Web Search: by Google
channel navigation



 News Home Page
 Photo Galleries
 Politics
 Nation
 World
 Metro
 Traffic
 Education
 Communities
 Crime
 Obituaries
 Lottery
 Columnists
 Special Reports
 Photo Galleries
 Live Online
 Metro Index
 Business/Tech
 Sports
 Style
 Travel
 Health
 Opinion
 Weather
 Weekly Sections
 News Digest
 Classifieds
 Print Edition
 Archives
 News Index
Help
Partners:
Metro Toolbox

Metrorail Guide
Trip Planner
Commuter Bus
& Rail
School Report
Cards
College Guide
Home Sales
Metro Facts
Machine
Y2K Preparations
Volunteering
Federal Page
Letters to
the Editor
Visitors' Guide

Web Guides
Local Government
Neighborhoods
U.S. Government


Va. High Court Panel Bars Voter ID Plan

By R.H. Melton
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, October 23, 1999; Page A16

RICHMOND, Oct. 22 A Virginia Supreme Court panel issued a ruling today that effectively kills a program that would have required voters in two Northern Virginia counties and eight other localities to present identification before voting in the Nov. 2 elections.

By 5 to 1, the judges upheld an injunction granted to state Democrats this week blocking the start of a pilot program under which residents of Arlington and Fairfax counties, along with those in eight other jurisdictions, would have had to show an ID when voting next month. The program had been approved by the General Assembly.

"As far as Nov. 2, the pilot program will not go on," said Randy Davis, a spokesman for state Attorney General Mark L. Earley (R).

On Thursday afternoon, after a brief hearing before the court, lawyers for the administration of Gov. James S. Gilmore III (R) said they could have waited until late Monday before mailing $275,000 worth of voter identification cards and other literature to the localities.

Today's decision killed the voter experiment for now. The pilot program may be revived after a trial on its merits, Davis said.

In dissenting, Justice Cynthia D. Kinser said she could "find no evidence of irreparable harm" to Democrats and others who objected to the pilot program.

"Nor do I believe the public interest is served by the issuance of an injunction . . . which seeks to further the public good by preventing voter fraud," Kinser said.

Kinser is a Republican appointee, while the five judges who rejected the appeal are Democratic appointees.

Tim Murtaugh, a spokesman for the state Republican Party, said fraud could continue. "Democrats ought to be planting [campaign] signs in graveyards all across the commonwealth," he said.

Replied Craig K. Bieber, the spokesman for state Democrats: "Virginia does not have a voter fraud problem. Virginia has a voter participation problem.

"We did not need this," Bieber said.



 
E-Mail This Article
 


© 1999 The Washington Post Company


Back to the top