OnPolitics






OnPolitics
  Political News
Variables.ucactualname/Politics

 Front
 Elections
 The Issues
 Federal Page
 Polls
 Columns - Cartoons
 Live Online
 Online Extras
 Photo Galleries
Politics
Where You Live

Go
Enter ZIP code or state abbreviation.
PARTNERS
MSNBC

CQ

AvantGo





Transcript: Ridge Issues New Terror Alert

eMediaMillWorks
eMediaMillWorks
Monday, Dec. 3, 2001

Following is the full transcript of Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge's news conference in which he issued a warning to the American people on possible new terror attacks against U.S. targets, at home and abroad.

HOMELAND SECURITY DIRECTOR RIDGE: Good afternoon.

I have just concluded a conference call with the nation's governors to let them know what I'm here to share with the American people. I might add, I also wanted to commend them for their work in improving and strengthening homeland security since September 11. We've been in frequent communication either with the organizations or with individual governors, and I think their work to date has reflected the kind of relationship between the federal and the state and local government that we need to make a permanent part of our homeland security defense.

Over the last several days, our intelligence and law enforcement agencies have seen an increased volume and level of activity involving threats of terrorist attacks. The information we have does not point to any specific target either in America or abroad, and it does not outline any specific type of attack. However, the analysts who review this information believe the quantity and level of threats are above the norm and have reached a threshold where we should once again place the public on general alert, just as we have done on two previous occasions since September 11.

During his address on homeland security in Atlanta, President Bush promised the American people that when we have evidence of credible threats we will issue appropriate alerts. That is exactly what we are doing here today.

The president also reminded all of us that a terrorism alert is not a signal to stop your life, it is a call to be vigilant, to know that your government is on high alert and to add your eyes and your ears to our efforts to find and stop those who want to do us harm.

Our government is taking precautions. This afternoon the FBI is issuing a terrorist threat advisory update to 18,000 law enforcement agencies across the country through the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System, known as NLETS. Law enforcement agencies have been instructed to stay on the highest alert and to immediately notify the FBI of any unusual or suspicious activity.

Again--and I emphasize this, perhaps, to my own peril, but again, the threats we are picking up are very generic. They warn of more attacks, but are not specific about where or what type. We do know that the next several weeks, which bring the final weeks of Ramadan and important religious observations in other faiths, have been times when terrorists have planned attacks in the past.

For example, it was December of 1999 authorities in Jordan, Canada and the United States uncovered and prevented plans for a series of attacks related to the dawn of the millennium. Those plans were thwarted when intelligence learned about them and law enforcement arrested the suspected terrorists.

Now, obviously, the further removed we get from September 11, I think the natural tendency is to let down our guard. Unfortunately, we cannot do that.

We are a nation at war. We are the targets of enemies who have demonstrated they have no remorse about killing thousands of innocent civilians. The government will continue to do everything we can to find and stop those who seek to harm us, but I believe we owe it to the American people to remind them that they must be vigilant as well.

Now I submit the very first question the American people will ask, "So, Governor Ridge, besides being vigilant, what else should my family and I do?"

The answer is you should report any suspicious activity or behavior to local authorities and, perhaps as importantly, you should heed the words of your president who has called on all of us to rely on our good judgment and our common sense, and to continue to live in a spirit of courage and optimism and resolve to defeat the enemy.

QUESTION: Governor, what makes these threats credible, besides their volume? And are they coming from any specific terrorist group or cell, for example, Al Qaeda?

RIDGE: Every single day, the intelligence community gathers information and makes judgments--renders judgments about their credibility and their relevance. And the accumulation of information we've received over the past couple of days has risen to the level where we thought it was appropriate to, again, put out a general alert.

It comes from multiple sources, and others say there are men and women within the community whose business has been for years to take a look at that information, draw conclusions and determine what we should do about it. But it is just the volume, as well as, obviously, the credibility associated with some of the information we've received that led us to have this discussion around which there was no disagreement--that it was at the volume, and at the level we should remind America we're still at war, we're still at risk, be vigilant, be aware.

QUESTION: Is there any connection between this new warning, and the Israeli attacks and the, sort of, response to the Palestinian suicide bombings?

RIDGE: There is nothing in the information that we've received that would draw a specific connection. But it is important, I think, to note that from time to time, even in a very vigilant society that's had to deal with acts of political terrorism, not for months, but for decades, that the unthinkable can happen, and innocent people can be killed.

QUESTION: Governor Ridge, do you feel that there has been, as you said, law enforcement agencies letting down their guard, and the public letting down their guard since Ashcroft announced that there was a heightened state of alert a couple of weeks ago? Do you feel that the American public has, kind of, moved in a sense of comfort, since that heightened state of alert nothing has happened?

RIDGE: Well, I think that America generally has remained at a state of readiness and alert. And fortunately has--they've basically accepted the president's encouragement to go live your lives.

At least the retail sales on the day after Thanksgiving suggested that a lot of people were back into a routine normally associated with this time of the year.

But I think it is very predictable and very understandable and very human, the further you get, the further away you are from an event, that distance and time may even unconsciously erode your commitment, erode that wariness--that attention span.

And so again, to remind everyone, we're still at war, we're still at risk. The one war, two battlefields, you know, you see pictures of those Marines and those soldiers digging in, they don't have to be reminded because they've got a conventional battle field. Ours is still an unconventional battle field, and I think it's very appropriate that we remind all Americans to be at alert.

QUESTION: Governor Ridge, to follow up, the last time you were here in the briefing room you told us that we were on a state of alert indefinitely. Did you ever specifically ask local or federal officials to back off of that state of alert? Or have they backed off in any way?

RIDGE: I would suspect, depending on the state, and depending on the decisions that some of the governors may have made, in terms of the resources and the people they've committed to defending what they consider to be points of vulnerability in their states, they may have made some adjustments.

And basically, in my conversation with my colleagues a few minutes ago, I said, "Now is not the time to back off. I believe you're out here, I believe you're vigilant, but over the next several, based on this information, it's my recommendation you remain at the state of readiness."

And the other recommendation, frankly, was to remind our citizens, no matter where you live--it can be a big state with a dense population or you can be a smaller state with a lot of rural communities--we have no way of assuring or guaranteeing or pinpointing where the terrorists will attack.

QUESTION: Can I as you about the anthrax? Are you guys now satisfied that, Ottilie Lundgren's case came from cross-contamination? And is that, frankly, more of a reason for people to worry about the mail than less?

RIDGE: Well, based upon the identification of the letter that followed the Daschle letter and its delivery to the home in her neighborhood, it certainly offers a plausible explanation for what transpired. But it's also, at least to date, in conflict with the fact that they've taken swabs in her house where the mail may have been deposited and other places, and there are no traces in her home. So I think it adds some credibility to an explanation, but it does not confirm that explanation.

QUESTION: Governor, can you help us and the American people understand the scope of this new information? Does this increased level picked up by intelligence services emanate from one part of the world or is communications with terrorist cells around the world? And do any of the communications--is the source of those communications here in the United States?

RIDGE: Well, the information we received is literally from, as you reported, as you know, from all around the world, and the sources, in terms of their geography, are no different than anything that we've received in the past. But--I mean, the origin--but the sources are more credible and, let me just say, the decibel level is higher as they talk about potential attacks.

Again, the origin is pretty much the same, in terms of the location of where the information have been gathered, but those people involved in the communication, we deemed as more credible. And it's also the volume over the last couple of days.

QUESTION: As you evaluate--plan to come before the American people and issue the kind of alert you're issuing here, is it a function more of quantity of intelligence or quality? Can you give me--if you have any kind of a framework that you can share with us, we'd certainly love to know about that.

RIDGE: Well, it's a very appropriate question. Suffice it to say that judgments are placed upon the different kinds of communication, the different kinds of information received on a day-to-day basis. And, obviously, within the intelligence community, we've got a lot of very talented people with a great deal of experience and are very intuitive--a lot of them are very intuitive about the kind of information received, and their ability to connect the dots is based upon experience as well. And sometimes there's legitimate disagreement within the community as to whether or not they are specific enough or credible enough or rise to a level where you've got to bring this matter before the American public.

I'm, unfortunately, giving you a general answer to a specific question. It's more of an art than a science. But the conclusion of everyone who's looked at this information over the past couple of days--it was again a time to remind America: We're at war, we're fighting them in Afghanistan, we're going to fight them in America and one of the best ways to combat the enemy is to be alert and be situationally aware.

QUESTION: Is this information specifically connected, did you say, to the observations of Ramadan or other holidays? And did you consider the impact on holiday retail sales of making this warning, and how did that discussion go?

RIDGE: Well, we--certainly the convergence of different religious observations over the next couple weeks is--and the impact that that has on the celebration of faith and holidays is something we certainly took into consideration.

But, you know, the terrorists, even if there was a specific timetable, or a specific holiday toward which they were pointing--I mean, I think we know based on previous experience that if we were able to disrupt that activity, and if they had to postpone it, they would wait until they were prepared and could strike.

So, yes, it was considered. We don't believe there should be--nor there will be any change in anybody's plans to participate in their religious holidays, and to enjoy the seasons and their families. But again, the convergence of information suggests, ladies of gentlemen of America, you know, we're at war, be on alert.

QUESTION: General Ridge, how should the public understand the process--this alert process? You come out and give us alerts from time to time, and tell people what you've told them today, but alerts never seemed to get lifted, we just get new ones to replace the old ones. And I'm just wondering, if you worry about people becoming jaded as a result of this process.

QUESTION: What's the president's role in the (OFF-MIKE)

RIDGE: Well, the president--this matter was presented to the president this morning, and he approved our decision to go forward and make the announcement.

Discerning specific, credible information and concluding that it gives rise to a reminder to America that we're still at war is a--as I said before, is an art, it's not a science.

And it would be so much easier, admittedly, if there were a little more specifics we could refer to, but there are not. These are shadow soldiers, this is a shadow enemy. As a soldier from time to time in my personal experience, and a lot of other soldiers have experienced in a more conventional wartime situation, often you are given information about the location of the enemy, the size of the enemy, perhaps how the enemy is equipped. This is a little bit different time.

But again, as we make those calculations and draw those conclusions, there's not always broad-based agreement that this is a credible threat. We viewed these as credible, and that's why we're just asking America to be on alert, be ready.

QUESTION: Is this more serious than the other two threats? Is this threat alert more serious than the previous two?

RIDGE: Well, you know, conceivably, if you take a look, this has been the third alert, clearly, but every day we accumulate information.

Every day the analysts take a look at the sources. Every day they try to put the dots together. But it's not every day that Attorney General Ashcroft or I've come out to the podium.

And it has been the aggregation of this information and the unanimous conclusion by the experts over the past couple of days, as they've looked at it, it's now time to come back out and remind America: We're still at war, be on alert.

Thank you very much.

© 2001 The Washington Post Company


SEARCH:


Search Options