The Washington Post
Navigation Bar
Navigation Bar

Partners:
Related Items
 On Our Site
  • Discuss the upcoming term with The Post's Joan Biskupic

  • Supreme Court Special Report

    On the Web
  • 4th Circuit opinion: Brzonkala v. VPI State University (FindLaw)

  • 7th Circuit opinion: Herdrich v. Pegram (FindLaw)

  •   Court to Hear Case on Violence Law

    By Joan Biskupic
    Washington Post Staff Writer
    Wednesday, September 29, 1999; Page A21

    The Supreme Court said yesterday it would use the case of a Virginia Tech student who claims she was raped by two football players to decide whether Congress overstepped its power when it allowed women to sue rapists, stalkers and other attackers.

    In a dispute that has drawn national attention, Christy Brzonkala sued Antonio J. Morrison and James Landale Crawford under the Violence Against Women Act for the alleged 1994 dormitory attack. A federal appeals court ruled against her, saying Congress exceeded its authority when it passed the 1994 law permitting victims of gender-based violence to win money damages in civil litigation.

    By taking up Brzonkala's appeal, and one by the Justice Department defending the law, the high court is poised to decide both the constitutionality of the law--championed by women's rights advocates and a majority of state attorneys general--and the extent of Congress's powers to address civil rights problems in the states.

    In a series of recent rulings, the Supreme Court has curtailed congressional power in favor of the states.

    The Judicial Conference, composed of the nation's top federal judges, also has complained about the law in objecting to Congress's trend of turning local offenses into federal crimes.

    When the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the violence act earlier this year, it said, "Such a statute. . . . cannot be reconciled with the principles of limited federal government upon which this nation is founded."

    But Martha Davis, legal director for the NOW Legal Defense and Education Fund, which represents Brzonkala, said her appeal is bolstered by the fact that 31 states have urged the court to uphold the law.

    "This isn't an area in which the states are saying their authority is being impinged," she said. Davis added that Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, a member of the five-justice bloc that has struck down federal statutes that tread on the traditional domain of the states, may be influenced by the women's rights issues in Brzonkala v. Morrison.

    Brzonkala, who was a freshman in 1994, claims that within minutes of meeting Morrison and Crawford, they pinned her on a bed in her dormitory and took turns raping her.

    Brzonkala stopped going to classes, became depressed and eventually dropped out of Virginia Tech, officially known as Virginia Polytechnic Institute.

    No criminal charges were filed against the men.

    Michael R. Rosman of the Center for Individual Rights, representing Morrison and Crawford, had urged the Supreme Court to let the 4th Circuit ruling stand, emphasizing that other appeals courts had yet to weigh in on the law's constitutionality.

    The announcement yesterday of nine new cases was the result of the justices' first big conference of the 1999-2000 term. The justices have a total of 44 new cases for the session, which officially begins with oral arguments on Oct. 4.

    © 1999 The Washington Post Company

    Back to the top


    Navigation Bar
    Navigation Bar