<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
<channel><title><![CDATA[washingtonpost.com - Ellen Goodman (washingtonpost.com)]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</link><description /><language>en-us</language><ttl>15</ttl>
<item><title><![CDATA[ A Vatican Retreat on Homosexuality ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/kWxPnFlBnXs/AR2005120201511.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/02/AR2005120201511.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- Somewhere along the way the dividing line over gay issues picked up and moved. It's no longer between red and blue states, or left and right wings, but between nature and nurture. Or, to be more precise, between those who believe that homosexuality is a choice and those who believe that homosexuality is innate.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/kWxPnFlBnXs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[A]]></category><category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category><category><![CDATA[Retreat]]></category><category><![CDATA[on]]></category><category><![CDATA[Homosexuality]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/02/AR2005120201511.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Equal-Opportunity Bash ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/PkoZ1GY3HoY/AR2005102101820.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/21/AR2005102101820.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sun, 23 Oct 2005 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- Call me a cockeyed pessimist, but I'm having trouble finding any good news in the trashing of Harriet Miers. Somehow Miers has become proof that we have moved on to a great gender-free utopia, a post-feminist world in which we can now mercilessly tear down a woman without fear of being labeled a sexist piglet.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/PkoZ1GY3HoY" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Equal-Opportunity]]></category><category><![CDATA[Bash]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/10/21/AR2005102101820.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ In Praise of a Snail's Pace ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/_C_x9rZ5-UE/AR2005081201386.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/12/AR2005081201386.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><description>CASCO BAY, Maine -- I arrive at the island post office carrying an artifact from another age. It's a square envelope, handwritten, with a return address that can be found on a map. Inside is a condolence note, a few words of memory and sympathy to a wife who has become a widow. I could have sent these words far more efficiently through e-mail than through this "snail mail." But I am among those who still believe that sympathy is diluted by two-thirds when it arrives over the Internet transom.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/_C_x9rZ5-UE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[In]]></category><category><![CDATA[Praise]]></category><category><![CDATA[of]]></category><category><![CDATA[a]]></category><category><![CDATA[Snail's]]></category><category><![CDATA[Pace]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/12/AR2005081201386.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Views That Facts Can't Shake ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/miVDvN7hJl4/AR2005061701219.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/17/AR2005061701219.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- The medical examiners delivered their autopsy report in the most matter-of-fact tone. Terri Schiavo's brain had atrophied to half the normal size for a woman her age. Her eyes, the focus of that famous videotape, saw nothing. She was blind.&lt;br clear="all"/&gt;&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/wpni.rss/opinion/columns;pos=ad9;tile=9;ad=rss;sz=479x40;ord=92483513865" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/wpni.rss/opinion/columns;pos=ad9;tile=9;ad=rss;sz=479x40;ord=92483513865" border="0" vspace="5"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/miVDvN7hJl4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Views]]></category><category><![CDATA[That]]></category><category><![CDATA[Facts]]></category><category><![CDATA[Can't]]></category><category><![CDATA[Shake]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/17/AR2005061701219.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Dispensing Morality ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/y-hjzZoCrO8/AR2005040801705.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/08/AR2005040801705.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2005 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- To begin with, I don't believe that anyone should be compelled to do work he or she regards as unethical. History is full of heroes who rebelliously followed their consciences. It's also full of people who shamefully followed orders.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/y-hjzZoCrO8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Dispensing]]></category><category><![CDATA[Morality]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/04/08/AR2005040801705.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ An Oscar For  Dialogue ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/ecv1TPw2HVQ/AR2005032301120.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/03/23/AR2005032301120.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>Is it too late to create an Oscar for the Most Politically Controversial Film? It would be awfully handy to have a designated category for controversy so the rest of us could concentrate on what everyone's wearing.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/ecv1TPw2HVQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[An]]></category><category><![CDATA[Oscar]]></category><category><![CDATA[For]]></category><category /><category><![CDATA[Dialogue]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/03/23/AR2005032301120.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ The High Court's Unhealthy Secrecy ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/_NOAu8ph6xg/AR2005033113169.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/01/08/AR2005033113169.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- I can only imagine what William Rehnquist thinks of all this. When he first became chief justice, a reporter asked about updates on the health of the justices. He shot back: "You people can be like a bunch of vultures." Does Rehnquist see vultures circling over his black robe? His spokesman says he won't be in court for the new session on Monday. Will he swear in the president on Jan. 20, as he has promised?&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/_NOAu8ph6xg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[The]]></category><category><![CDATA[High]]></category><category><![CDATA[Court's]]></category><category><![CDATA[Unhealthy]]></category><category><![CDATA[Secrecy]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/01/08/AR2005033113169.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Will Her Voice Ever Be Heard? ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/oOlZprSt-Jk/AR2005033113165.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/12/11/AR2005033113165.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- Ever wonder what happened to the State Department's chief of propaganda? The head of public diplomacy was supposed to win the hearts and minds of the Muslim street.&lt;br clear="all"/&gt;&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/wpni.rss/opinion/columns;pos=ad9;tile=9;ad=rss;sz=479x40;ord=92483515588" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/wpni.rss/opinion/columns;pos=ad9;tile=9;ad=rss;sz=479x40;ord=92483515588" border="0" vspace="5"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/oOlZprSt-Jk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Will]]></category><category><![CDATA[Her]]></category><category><![CDATA[Voice]]></category><category><![CDATA[Ever]]></category><category><![CDATA[Be]]></category><category><![CDATA[Heard?]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/12/11/AR2005033113165.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Those Poor College Conservatives ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/ZIiKw7Yg_-o/AR2005033113062.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/12/04/AR2005033113062.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- I like the old maxim that academic politics are so vicious because the stakes are so small. How else to explain the intramural conflicts that erupt over such searing campus issues as tenure and parking?&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/ZIiKw7Yg_-o" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Those]]></category><category><![CDATA[Poor]]></category><category><![CDATA[College]]></category><category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/12/04/AR2005033113062.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ The Truths of 'Desperate Housewives' ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/uu0jpslBIqQ/AR2005033112829.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/11/20/AR2005033112829.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 20 Nov 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- I'm not supposed to like "Desperate Housewives." It's either post-feminist or pre-feminist. It's too racy or too retro. It's either an example of the backlash or a product of the cultural collapse.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/uu0jpslBIqQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[The]]></category><category><![CDATA[Truths]]></category><category><![CDATA[of]]></category><category><![CDATA['Desperate]]></category><category><![CDATA[Housewives']]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/11/20/AR2005033112829.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Sex Ed Silliness in Texas ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/JqpH3RrQ1AU/AR2005033113043.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/11/13/AR2005033113043.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- Here it is, just days after the red states gave their presidential seal of approval to the man from Texas, and we've already been treated to another skirmish in the culture wars. The Texas Board of Education has now given its educational seal of approval to what may soon be dubbed Red Sex Ed.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/JqpH3RrQ1AU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category><category><![CDATA[Ed]]></category><category><![CDATA[Silliness]]></category><category><![CDATA[in]]></category><category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/11/13/AR2005033113043.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Winning Back  Values Voters ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/0rR6OxGmf58/AR2005033113174.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/11/06/AR2005033113174.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2004 00:00:00 EST</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- I got familiar with the losing business rather early in life. When I was just a kid my dad ran for Congress. He lost by about 600 votes, although I suspect that over the years, that number has been chipped away by family lore.&lt;br clear="all"/&gt;&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/wpni.rss/opinion/columns;pos=ad9;tile=9;ad=rss;sz=479x40;ord=92483515890" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/wpni.rss/opinion/columns;pos=ad9;tile=9;ad=rss;sz=479x40;ord=92483515890" border="0" vspace="5"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/0rR6OxGmf58" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Winning]]></category><category><![CDATA[Back]]></category><category /><category><![CDATA[Values]]></category><category><![CDATA[Voters]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/11/06/AR2005033113174.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ A Post-Bush Mind-Set ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/6M73L24pYWA/AR2005033113170.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/10/30/AR2005033113170.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2004 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- While we are still in a pre-Nov. 2 mind-set, may I offer my last few words on the "pre-Sept. 11 mind-set"?&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/6M73L24pYWA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[A]]></category><category><![CDATA[Post-Bush]]></category><category><![CDATA[Mind-Set]]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/10/30/AR2005033113170.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
<item><title><![CDATA[ Questions for the 'Comforter in Chief' ]]></title><link>http://feeds.washingtonpost.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~3/dwDJaxugYw8/AR2005033113067.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/10/09/AR2005033113067.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:00:00 EDT</pubDate><description>BOSTON -- How could I have forgotten that George W. was a compassionate conservative? He chose the moniker of a kinder, gentler Republican four years ago to distinguish himself from Newt Gingrich's crowd. Newt's idea of compassion was building a chain of orphanages.&lt;img src="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/wp-dyn/rss/linkset/2005/03/25/LI2005032500903_xml/~4/dwDJaxugYw8" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ellen Goodman]]></dc:creator><category><![CDATA[Questions]]></category><category><![CDATA[for]]></category><category><![CDATA[the]]></category><category><![CDATA['Comforter]]></category><category><![CDATA[in]]></category><category><![CDATA[Chief']]></category><category /><feedburner:origLink>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2004/10/09/AR2005033113067.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns</feedburner:origLink></item>
</channel></rss>
