As
we all have discussed at great length on and off, about the implications
of digital alteration in photographs, we have insisted all along that
such transformations are not the only way information can be manipulated.
We are obviously not saying something new, however what is possibly
new in all of this is the Internet as a means of distributing such information
and questioning it. I have seen a barrage of conflicting data during
these days that I am sure I am not the only one who has received them.
Not only over the TV networks but over the Internet as well as in newspapers
and magazines.
To
receive such a diversified source of information is great and a very
positive trend, provided we are also alert to what it is that we are
reading (yes, you can also read a photograph). I have received over
the Internet some letters that allegedly were sent by the person who
signed them, copies were made from these and circulated widely, only
to discover later that they were false, the original sender had never
done so.
From
Márcio A. V. Carvalho [State University of Campinas - Brazil]
we have been getting information that the images that were aired by
CNN were images SHOT BACK IN 1991!!! Those are images of Palestinians
celebrating the invasion of Kuwait! . CNN has not responded to our request
for clarification, so we do not know who has been telling the truth.
In either way, the Internet has empowered us to find out of such alleged
transgressions in real time [update].
One
child told his father that 300 buildings had been shot down by 300 planes,
after having seen as many repetitions of the same scene on that fatal
Tuesday but not having yet the tools with which to decode such repetition.
By such unending reiteration other forms of consciousness are brought
to bear, which brings up the question of the motivation in such replications.
And
last but not least, when CNN comes out with a shining new logo for a
NEW WAR while the smoke is still coming out of the World Trade Center
and The Pentagon, are they really reporting the news or making them?
Did they pick up where William Randolph Hearst left off? Are they trying
to make up for the lost advertising revenue due to the recession by
fueling the sentiments towards a NEW WAR, just like the old press barons
did yesterday? CNN could follow the example of another network, CNBC,
whose logo is just "America on ALERT".
Be
that as it may, this time around we have the Internet, and each other
to share and discuss the news aside from the official sources. Let us
be vigilant and critical of all that we hear and see. Our older children
could really benefit from having such discussions going on in their
midst.
Maybe
in addition to all the flag waving that is going on, we should become
magicians. You know the old trick of pulling out doves from where none
can apparently can be found. Who knows, instead of a NEW WAR, we could
find something a bit more constructive. Wisdom to deal with destruction
might not be such a bad idea. At least this one has not really been
much discussed.
Pedro Meyer's photographs are found in the collections of more than 40 major museums throughout the world. He's also authored several books, including Los Cohetes Duraron Todo el Dia; Tempii di America; and Espejo de Espinas. His column appears each month in Camera Works.