![]() |
||
|
By Dan Froomkin Campaign finance is a confusing topic in many ways. But it is money which, arguably, determines the very basics of our democracy: Who runs, who wins, and how they govern. This overview summarizes the critical issues underlying the debate and the ongoing criminal investigations. This special report also includes key stories from The Post, a selection of Post editorials and columns, profiles of key players and a list of online resources.
Part 1: The amount of money needed to win a federal election these days most notably, the presidency is enormous. The Clinton and Dole campaigns spent about $232 million in the 1996 campaign cycle supplemented by about $69 million in "issue ads" paid for by the Republican and Democratic national committees. Across the country, Election '96 cost about $2.7 billion, the costliest ever.
Perhaps more than anything, it takes an awful lot of money to buy television and radio ads which are virtually mandatory for any national political campaign and for many local and statewide ones as well. For example, a massive television advertising blitz that started in October 1995 greatly contributed to the Clinton reelection victory by retuning his image and drowning out any competing message. It didn't come cheap. The ads which were paid for by the Democratic National Committee, not by the Clinton/Gore campaign cost about $44 million.
© Copyright 1998 The Washington Post Company |
|||||||||||||||||