Introduction Key Stories Opinion Key Players Matching Game Coffee Guests Overnight Guests Discussions Web Links


Politics Section
Special Reports



From The Post
Campaign Finance Still in Senate Limbo (Sept. 20)

Senators Hear Tale of Offer to DNC (Sept. 20)

Gore Hires Private Defense Lawyers

By Ron Fournier
Associated Press Writer
Friday, September 19, 1997;
8:14 p.m. EDT

STANFORD, Calif. (AP) – His legal woes worsening, Vice President Al Gore has hired two private defense attorneys to handle investigations of questionable fund raising in the 1996 election.

The hiring of Jim Neal of Nashville, Tenn. and George Frampton of Washington reflects growing concern that a special prosecutor might be named to study Gore's fund-raising activities.

Lorraine Voles, a spokeswoman for Gore, confirmed the attorneys' hiring in a telephone interview.

"The vice president wanted private counsel so he can get his position presented directly and personally to the Department of Justice," Voles said. "He has instructed his private counsel to continue to cooperate fully with the department."

Attorney General Janet Reno has until the first week of October to complete an initial 30-day review about the possibility of conducting a formal investigation into whether an independent counsel should be appointed to look into Gore's fund-raising.

If she approves the formal investigation, the Justice Department would have 90 days to decide whether to ask a federal court to appoint a special prosecutor.

The White House counsel's office represents Gore only is his official capacity. It became clear in recent days that for the vice president to make his case to the Justice Department, he would need private counsel, said an official close to Gore.

The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Gore's position will not change: He says he did no wrong.

There are no plans for Gore to launch a legal defense fund to pay his attorney fees, the official said. President Clinton and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton have run up hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal bills, far more than their legal defense fund has raised.

Gore has not worked out the financial arrangements with the attorneys, the official said.

Neal is a longtime friend and adviser of the Gores. He is a partner of the Neal and Harwell law firm.

Frampton, a former assistant secretary of interior under Clinton, will be co-counsel. He is based in Washington.

Gore says he broke no rules, but many Democrats are braced for the appointment of a special prosecutor to investigate further. Because special prosecutors have wide latitude in the scope of their investigations, such a probe could haunt Gore through the 2000 campaign.

An unfettered probe also could increase pressure on Clinton, who so far has weathered congressional investigations without serious harm to his popularity.

Gore acknowledged in March that he had made phone solicitations to 48 Democratic donors from his White House office between November 1995 and May 1996.

Federal law prohibits federal officials from making fund-raising solicitations on government property, although experts disagree whether that statute applies to calls made to donors outside the building.

Gore originally said he did not charge any of the calls to taxpayers, insisting he had used a Democratic Party credit card. But last month, the White House acknowledged 20 of his calls were originally charged to taxpayers.

Federal law prohibits the use of government resources for politics.

Gore and his supporters have steadfastly maintained that the calls he made from the White House were legal.

The Democratic National Committee recently reimbursed the Treasury $24.20 for calls in which Gore didn't use a credit card. White House officials blamed staffers for the oversight.

As for the law prohibiting solicitations on federal property, Gore said he was advised prior to making the White House calls that there was nothing wrong with such solicitations. He said that after the controversy erupted, he also was told by his lawyers that there was "no controlling legal authority" to apply the law to his calls.

Earlier this month, it was disclosed that six donations solicited by Gore ended up in so-called "hard money" accounts regulated by the Federal Election Commission. Reno had refused earlier to seek an independent counsel, citing the lack of any evidence that "hard money" contributions had been solicited from federal property. After the disclosure she said she would look at it anew.

Last week, the AP disclosed that Gore made an earlier set of phone solicitations to donors in the final weeks of the 1994 election. That time, however, he was driven to Democratic Party headquarters rather than make them from the White House.

Legal experts said the disclosure could sway the deliberations about a special prosecutor, raising questions about whether Gore had prior reason to suspect making calls from the White House was improper.

Republicans are adamant that Reno name an independent counsel, and warn that she could even face impeachment if she fails to do so. "If she does not go forward," Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott of Mississippi said Sunday, "we would have to act in some responsible way."

A Time/CNN Poll released last week indicated that 44 percent of Americans considered Gore's fund-raising activities inappropriate and 60 percent thought an independent counsel should investigate.

© Copyright 1997 The Associated Press

Back to the top

Go to Campaign Finance Report | Go to Politics Section



WashingtonPost.com
Navigation image map
Home page Site Index Search Help! Home page Site Index Search Help!