Whitewater Special Report
Navigation Bar
Navigation Bar

 Time Line
 Key Stories
 Links &

  blue line
Inquiry on McDougal Motive

Related Links
  • Coverage of the McDougal Trial

  • Clinton Accused Special Report

  • The Associated Press
    Friday, April 9, 1999; Page A02

    LITTLE ROCK, April 8 – Jurors deliberating Susan McDougal's fate asked today whether they can consider an "innocent reason" for her refusal to testify in the Whitewater investigation of President Clinton.

    In a note to the judge, jurors asked a question that goes to the heart of McDougal's defense: She says she feared independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr would charge her with perjury unless she falsely implicated the president and first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton in wrongdoing.

    U.S. District Judge George Howard Jr. responded to the jurors' question by letting them sort out the issue for themselves, referring the panel back to the instructions he read to them earlier in the day. The jurors adjourned for the day without reaching a verdict.

    Before deliberations began today, Howard instructed the jury that McDougal would be guilty of criminal contempt if she "willfully" violated a court order to testify and did not act "by accident, mistake or other innocent reason."

    But Howard also said McDougal's defense that Starr was trying to get her to lie could be applied only to the obstruction of justice charge against her, not to the two contempt charges.

    © Copyright 1999 The Associated Press

    Back to the top

    Navigation Bar
    Navigation Bar
    yellow pages