<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>washingtonpost.com - Post Editorials</title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/print/sunday/outlook/editorials?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</link><description>Post Editorials</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>15</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Darfur's Real Death Toll]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12485-2005Apr23.html?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12485-2005Apr23.html?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 7:47:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[  THE BUSH administration's challenge on Darfur is to persuade the world to wake up to the severity of the crisis. On his recent visit to Sudan, Deputy Secretary of State Robert B. Zoellick took a step in the opposite direction. He said that the State Department's estimate of deaths in Darfur was 60,000 to 160,000, a range that dramatically understates the true scale of the killing. If Mr. Zoellick wants to galvanize action on Darfur, he must take a fresh look at the numbers.]]></description><author></author></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Senate's Hypocrisy]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12486-2005Apr23.html?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12486-2005Apr23.html?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 7:47:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[  CONGRESS IS spitting fire about China's allegedly unfair trade practices, which it blames for the enormous U.S. trade deficit. But that deficit is as much a reflection of Congress's habit of spending more than it raises in taxes, which contributes to the dearth of national savings. For the latest example of shameless congressional pork, consider a bill recently marked up in the Senate to lavish at least $10 billion on the Army Corps of Engineers.]]></description><author></author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Viewer Beware]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12487-2005Apr23.html?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12487-2005Apr23.html?nav=rss_print/sunday/outlook/editorials</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 7:47:23 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[  PRODUCT PLACEMENT has become a cynical fact of modern life. When you see a store logo in a movie or a character with a brand-name beverage, you can be pretty sure it didn't get there by chance: Money changed hands. What you might not know is that a similar but more insidious transaction takes place in television news.]]></description><author></author></item></channel></rss>