|
Mantle's Critics Swing, Miss
By Shirley Povich
Washington Post Columnist
Monday, June 19, 1995; Page C01
The stories haven't been fair to Mickey Mantle. Here the poor guy
is, in deep crisis in a Dallas hospital; one of the greatest ballplayers
of all time, badly diseased and with death's door ajar, and relying now
on the last roll of the dice, a liver transplant that may or may not
work. Often it doesn't.
And what is being said about him? That he was one of the biggest
baseball drunks of all time, and yes, he was not always friendly to
kids, including his own, and he did louse up his family somewhat and
draw your own conclusions he wasn't a nice guy. In other words, what
a bum, they said.
That was the drift of so much written about him. The shame here,
and the regret, is that two of the many borderline to-hell-with-Mickey
Mantle pieces appeared consecutively in The Washington Post. Why?
Why at this time dwell on the dark side of Mickey Mantle,
particularly since he had denied none of this in a full confession of
his career weaknesses and misbehavior in a Sports Illustrated article
last year? He hadn't ducked it. It wasn't exactly news anymore after his
own bare-all gutsy admissions.
Where was the appreciation of Mickey Mantle's exciting
contributions to the game on the playing field, particularly his
eminence with his bat with all those pennant-winning Yankees teams? His
many spectacular deeds that made him a super performer for most of 20
years are rating no priority for those writers who denounced his drunken
binges.
And now the talk shows and others have made a big deal of the
preference Mantle got on the waiting list for a liver transplant; how
they promoted him to the top of the list. Ye Gods, did Mickey have
anything to do with that? Was this desperately sick man able to prevail
on his doctors and the whole organ transplant apparatus to jump in front
of the others? At this point Mickey was virtually on life support.
It was long known that country boy Mickey Mantle couldn't cope
with life in the Yankees fast lane in matters not connected with his bat
or his glove; he never was an intellectual giant.
Let me repeat the lead on a story I wrote for the Saturday Evening
Post issue of Feb. 2, 1957:
"On that April 1 day in 1951 when Mickey Mantle arrived in New York
for the first time he was an unsmiling and suspicious 19-year-old who
detrained from the South with the rest of the New York Yankees. And
already he was being acclaimed as the new wonder boy of the Yankees,
called up from Joplin, Mo., where he hit .383 with 26 big home runs. . .
.
"But the rookie was also remembering bits of a going-away advice he
had from home folks in Commerce, Okla.: The big city is full of traps
for country boys,' they told him. Don't talk to strangers.'
"Yet one week later in a New York hotel lobby there was this man
saying he could help Mantle get very rich from endorsements and personal
appearances. Then Mickey bought what was a version of the Brooklyn
Bridge reincarnate. He signed his name to a curious document in which he
acquired 50 percent of himself. The other 50 percent of his earnings
outside of his baseball salary was delegated to his personal
representative."
Mickey was years getting unhooked from that one.
In a later year Mickey Mantle bought 100 shares in an Oklahoma
insurance company at a cost of $3,500. But the company had one glaring
weakness. It was nonexistent, and Mantle again was the chump. All of
this is being noted to record that Mantle was often afflicted with an
economy of good judgment that led him into so much of his tsoris.
I was Mickey Mantle's friend. We golfed. As a baseball beat writer
I traveled with him on those Yankees trains in the years of all those
pennants. I knew his weaknesses, and it often came through that he did
want to be a nice person. I knew his drinking companions among them
Whitey Ford and Billy Martin.
Unlike Mantle, the country boy from small-town Oklahoma, they
didn't fall into the same prolonged traps that captured Mickey. Whitey
Ford and Billy Martin had the city smarts. Unlike Mickey, they were
aware the drinking was not a way of life, to begin the next binge before
Bacchus was back in the bottle. They could quit, he couldn't and would
pay for it dearly. Mickey Mantle had given all of the writers and
columnists so much to write about in his 18 years with the Yankees. Why
didn't it occur to them to emphasize that for 18 years this guy who won
so many games for the Yankees, who hit the ball farther than all the
players of history except Babe Ruth, was baseball's rare example of
physical courage.
For 18 years, he played hurt. In deep pain. Consider it.
Not a day when he took his glove to center field or his bat to the
plate that Mickey Mantle was not spavined by one damaged knee or the
other, or by a formerly broken foot that visited him with some old
pains, or by a calf that was ripped on a high school football field back
in Oklahoma. Another of his companions was the gnarled hamstring, almost
ever-present. He had that arrested case of osteomyelitis that set in
early in his career but kept breaking jail.
To understand how much Mantle was contorted by pain, yet kept
playing, is to listen to the medical report of the Yankees' team
physician, Sidney Gaynor:
"1951, right knee cartilage operation; 1952, right knee again;
1954, knee cyst removed; 1955, pulled groin muscle; 1956, left knee
sprained; 1957, right shoulder injury; 1959, broken finger; 1961, hip
abscess; 1962, left knee injury; 1963, broken metatarsal bone left foot;
1965, right shoulder surgery, right elbow and left knee injuries."
Also for more than the last 10 years Mickey played with elastic
bandages wrapped around his right leg from mid-calf to upper thigh, and
in the last few years he wrapped his left leg in the same way for
support.
Gaynor was asked whether Mickey was "brittle."
"No. It was just the demands he made on himself. He wanted to play
every day and he'd minimize things to get to play."
Didn't some of this deserve mention in the hour of Mantle's
desperation to stay alive, ahead of all the carping about his longtime
battle with the bottle? So many of his injuries were by invitation, his
own, so great were these surges he gave to the game while running down
fly balls, or chugging from the batter's box to first base in 3.1
seconds, a landmark clocking.
He could run. That was an anomaly. When did it ever happen, before
Mantle, that the biggest hitter on any team, the guy who hit the
farthest in the league, was also the fastest man on his team and its
best bunter? Never.
A Mantle specialty was the drag bunt that let him break from the
left side of the plate. The drag bunt is an art of the game and none
captured it like Mickey. You lay it down to a spot that gives both the
pitcher and the first baseman a fit. Who fields it? No matter. They
wouldn't get Mickey, who was already surging toward the bag.
When did Mickey Mantle bunt? Whenever he felt like it. From Casey
Stengel he had a blank check. Bunt when you feel like it. Drag bunting
on the count of 3 and 2 when a foul tip would get you out was rejected
as a tactic until Mantle made it one of his specialties. You could do it
if you had Mickey's supreme ability to do it.
Could Mantle play the outfield? When Joe DiMaggio quit and Mickey
took over in center field there was no lowering of standards. What a
compliment. Maybe he didn't quite have DiMag's arm, but he had more than
Joe's speed. He, too, could outrun a fly ball.
For many years a thought has occurred to me. I covered Willie
Mays's great catch of that steamer Vic Wertz hit in the 1954 World
Series. Mays took one look at that zinger toward deepest center in the
Polo Grounds, turned and caught up with the ball and speared it with his
back to the plate, a wondrous catch. Who else could have made it? Mickey
Mantle. Many years ago on the pro golf tour there was a player of some
prominence named Bo Wininger. Because I learned he had played football
and baseball on the same high school team with Mantle in Oklahoma, I
asked him about Mickey. "Gawd, he was fast," said Wininger. "Mickey ran
on top of the grass."
I saw an example of that in 1956 in Yankee Stadium the day hell
froze over and Don Larsen pitched a perfect game in the World Series.
There would have been no perfect 2-0 game for Larsen without what Mantle
did to Gil Hodges' line drive that was headed to the empty reaches in
left-center. That ball was certain to fall in until a flying Mantle
reached the scene from nowhere and speared it backhanded. Larsen should
have blown him a kiss.
What a luck-ridden club the Yankees were to have a switch hitter
such as Mantle. No way to pitch around him. He hit those 536 home runs,
but more spectacularly he hit 18 more in World Series games to beat Babe
Ruth's record.
It is not remembered that there were any miniature home runs by
Mantle. That ferocious swing from either side of the plate would not
permit the cheap homer. He was the man who came closer than anybody else
to hitting a fair ball out of vast, rearing Yankee Stadium. He missed
against Kansas City's Bill Fischer in 1963 when his swat failed by
inches to clear the facade and everything else in right-center. One
scientist said that ball might have gone 620 feet. Before that he barely
missed against the Senators' Pete Ramos.
And of course there was the history-maker that day in Griffith
Stadium in 1954 when Chuck Stobbs threw that pitch and Mantle swatted it
a measured 565 feet onto the street beyond the left-center bleachers. My
god, nobody before him had ever put one out of the park over those
bleachers stretching from the left field foul line to deepest center.
I asked the Senators' owner, Clark Griffith, for his comment on
that swat, suggesting also that a slight wind was blowing that day. His
answer was conclusive: "I don't care about that. That consarned wind has
been blowing for 100 years and nobody else ever hit one out of this
ballpark like that."
Why didn't they write about things like that, or about the
wonderful, the distinctive feats of the boy from Oklahoma who was the
seventh player in history (other than the original inductees) to make it
to the Hall of Fame on the first ballot? As a person he was not all bad.
He was shy, and comfortable only with his friends. Some years ago when
the Alexandria Grandstand Managers club invited him to appear as an
honored guest, he agreed with a stipulation. He said he would be there
if I was the master of ceremonies. He wanted a friend in view. If Mantle
wasn't quite as shy as DiMaggio it was nevertheless a tight fit. It
could be pointed out that Mickey was less disagreeable than shy.
He hit the golf ball a ton. The power that sped all those homers to
uncharted distances could be imagined on the golf course. But he
bemoaned his short game. That was the day he checked into the Yankees'
Fort Lauderdale clubhouse for spring training, greeting me with, "Hi ya,
Shirley, how you hitting? Let's play."
Now I am talking to one of the great men of baseball, who, with
60,000 fans in the park, the bases full, bottom of the ninth, the count
3 and 2, is the calmest guy in the place.
But Mantle is saying, "I'm hitting the ball but I can't score." I
asked him why he wasn't scoring and he said "It's my putting. Hell,
Shirley, I'm gutless." It was a commentary both on golf and Mantle's
self-demeaning modesty.
Why didn't they write about his magnanimity toward teammate Roger
Maris when in 1961 they were both trying to break Babe Ruth's record?
When he fell behind Maris it was Mantle who led the cheers for his
teammate, willing to stand for all those friendly poses with Maris and
smiling his friendship for the man winning the race. Who could say those
smiles were phony? Not from an uncalculating, uninhibited Mickey Mantle,
incapable of jealousy.
Or they could have written about Mickey and his gallant, gutsy
performance that day in a Fort Lauderdale hotel when after reporting for
spring training he suddenly announced it was no use anymore and said he
was retiring.
He made it a bare-bones announcement, leading off with "I can't
play anymore and I know it." I don't have my notes of that March 1,
1969, scene in the Yankee Clipper hotel but I have those of St. Louis
Post-Dispatch Hall of Fame writer Bob Broeg. More from Mickey: "I'm not
going to play any more baseball. I was really going to try but I didn't
think I could. . . . I have had three or four bad years in a row and
have received my biggest disappointment by falling under .300 {.298
career average} and I was actually dreading another season."
Also: "I can't hit. . . . I can't go from first to third when I
want to. I can't steal second when I want to. . . . I can't score from
second when I want to . . . these things break me up and I figure it's
best for the team that I stop now." With that statement Mantle showed
quality. There was a temptation here to say that he showed class, but
remembered is the caution of Post writer Myra McPherson, who rebuked
those who use that bromide, saying that "those who use class' don't have
much."
Mickey talked about steals, but he never stole with much frequency.
On the Yankees in those years there were too many guys to knock you
around DiMaggio, Hank Bauer, Yogi Berra, Tommy Henrich, Roger Maris,
Gil McDougald. Stealing was not a big thing with the Yankees.
But Mickey did hang up those great batting averages of .365, .353
and .321 plus a career slugging average of .557. He was a big league
star before he was 21.
During the Mantle years none in baseball could match him for
distance. Four times he led the league in homers. They voted him the
league's MVP three times, three times he finished second.
With Mantle back in the news as a very sick man, why did they not
write of his many feats and his dauntless physical courage? They also
could have said something about Mickey Mantle and Lou Gehrig, who is now
causing such a hoo-rah with Cal Ripken bearing down on Lou's magnificent
record of playing 2,130 consecutive games.
But Lou Gehrig goes not hold the record of playing more games than
anybody else in Yankee pinstripes. Who does? Mickey Mantle. More than
Gehrig, more than Ruth, more than any other Yankee. None can match
Mantle's 2,401 games in those pinstripes.
Was this not worthy of note when Mantle bounced back in the news
last week, a very sick man with his life at high risk? Whatever happened
to sentiments and judgments in our business? How did we get trapped in
that mentality of the checkout racks? When are they going to call off
the dogs? It's time.
© Copyright 1995 The Washington Post Company
Back to the top
|