<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>washingtonpost.com - Digital Cameras</title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/technology/personaltech/digitalcameras?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><description>Digital Cameras</description><language>en-us</language><ttl>15</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Brought to Digital Life]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9679-2004Dec18.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9679-2004Dec18.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Digital technology is radically changing the 165-year-old photography industry, creating turmoil and excitement as people buy digital cameras at rates far exceeding industry projections. <br><FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2" color="#666666"><B>-Leslie Walker</B></FONT>]]></description><author> Leslie Walker</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Let's Get Digital: What SLR Users Need to Know]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63174-2004Aug13.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63174-2004Aug13.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[It used to be that a serious photographer could be spotted by his Single Lens Reflex (SLR) camera. An adaptable marvel, the camera -- with the change of a lens -- could be modified for any photographic task, from taking near microscopic close-ups of flowers to capturing telescopic shots of the moon.]]></description><author> Roy Furchgott</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[No Picture-Perfect Option]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10789-2004Jul24.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10789-2004Jul24.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Digital cameras small enough to smuggle in a shirt pocket have been a reality for years. But tiny digicams that actually take good pictures are a recent development. <br><FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2" color="#666666"><B>-The Washington Post</b></font>]]></description><author> Alan S. Kay</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Digital SLRs Around $1,000]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58540-2004May1.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A58540-2004May1.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Digital single-lens-reflex cameras -- D-SLRs for short -- aren't quite a consumer-priced product yet, but these highly accurate, exceptionally flexible machines also no longer rank as a techno-luxury.]]></description><author> Jim Hawk</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[New Camcorders Put Tape on Notice]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A295-2004Jan31.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A295-2004Jan31.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Panasonic's D-Snap SV-AV100 and the Fisher FVD-C1 CameraCorder can untie you from tape, instead using postage-stamp-size SD Cards to record video. <br><FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2" color="#666666"><B>-The Washington Post</B></FONT>]]></description><author> Daniel Greenberg</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[SLR Flexibility Goes Digital]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38194-2003Sep20.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A38194-2003Sep20.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Canon's new EOS Digital Rebel is the first "single lens reflex" digicam to sell for under $1,000. That means professional photographic power at prices that consumers can stomach. <FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2"color="#666666"><B>- The Washington Post</B></FONT>]]></description><author> Jim Hawk</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fast Forward: Digital Cameras]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36407-2003Jun9.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A36407-2003Jun9.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Rob Pegoraro talks about The Post's annual review of digital cameras.]]></description><author>LiveOnline</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Place for Film In the Digital Age]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60430-2003May30.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60430-2003May30.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[If you have a choice of film or digital, is there any reason to go with chemicals instead of a computer chip? <FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2" color="#666666"><B>-Rob Pegoraro</B></FONT>]]></description><author> Rob Pegoraro</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[3 Ways to Print Your Digital Photos]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56232-2003May29.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56232-2003May29.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[So you got a digital camera and it's been fun just snapping away. Maybe you've even figured out how to get the pictures on your computer. But what's the best way to get them out of the machine as 4-by-6 prints?]]></description><author> Jim Hawk</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Low-Cost Digicams: Point, Shoot  And Shudder]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60268-2003May30.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60268-2003May30.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Can cheap, tiny digital cameras do for photography in the 21st century what cheap, tiny film cameras did in the last century? We tried three new cameras with low, low prices to see if the Instamatic of digital cameras has arrived yet.]]></description><author> Daniel Greenberg</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Software For Managing Digital Images]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60912-2003May31.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60912-2003May31.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Reviews of ACDSEE 5.0 from ACD Systems; Paint Shop Photo Album 4, from JASC; and IVIEW MEDIA from iView Multimedia.]]></description><author></author></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Digicam Memory Circus]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60428-2003May30.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60428-2003May30.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[CompactFlash or Memory Stick? Secure Digital or xD? If you're shopping for a digital camera, prepare to get familiar with these terms. <FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2" color="#666666"><B>-The Washington Post</B></FONT>]]></description><author> Mike Musgrove</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[A Few Shades Short of a Masterpiece]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19054-2003Feb28.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19054-2003Feb28.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[Apple Computer's iPhoto accomplishes many objectives, and now two programs for Windows make their own contributions.]]></description><author> Rob Pegoraro</author></item><item><title><![CDATA[Digital Camera for Less]]></title><link>http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21119-2002Dec6.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A21119-2002Dec6.html?nav=rss_technology/personaltech/digitalcameras</guid><pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 11:27:30 GMT</pubDate><description><![CDATA[You can still spend two, three times as much for a digital camera, but $500 these days will get you a lot. That means that you could use a digital camera as your only camera.<FONT face="verdana,MS Sans Serif,arial,helvetica" size="-2"color="#666666"><B>-The Washington Post</B></FONT>]]></description><author> Jim Hawk</author></item></channel></rss>