 |
Desert Fox Multimedia Day 1
|
|
|
Britain's Tony Blair Speaks on Iraq Attack
By Federal News Service
Wednesday, Dec. 16, 1998
PRIME MINISTER BLAIR: Earlier today, I gave authority for U.K.
forces to be deployed against Iraq. Operation Desert Fox was launched
at 10 p.m. London time. There can be no greater responsibility upon a
prime minister than to ask British servicemen to risk their lives for
the sake of peace and stability in another part of the world, and I
feel that responsibility tonight profoundly.
I spoke earlier today to Group Captain Rich Jones, who is in
charge of British forces in the Gulf. British involvement will be
significant. And I thanked him and them for their bravery and for
their professionalism, and I wished them well in what we would be
asking of them.
This action, of course, could have been avoided. Since the Gulf
War, the entire international community has worked to stop Saddam
Hussein from keeping and developing nuclear, chemical and biological
weapons, and from continuing to threaten his neighbors. For the
safety and stability of the region and of the wider world, he cannot
be allowed to do so. If he will not, through reason and diplomacy,
abandon his weapons of mass destruction program, it must be degraded
and diminished by military force.
Over the past few years, as you all know, we have engaged in
endless diplomacy at every level and of every kind. But we must face
the facts: Saddam Hussein has no intention of abiding by the
agreements he made. U.N. Resolution 687 bringing to an end the Gulf
war made it a condition of the cease-fire both that Iraq destroy its
weapons of mass destruction and agree to the monitoring of its
obligation to destroy such weapons.
Despite constant lies, prevarication, and breaching of the agreed
conditions, the weapons inspectors carried out their task, uncovering
in the process vast evidence of weapons of mass destruction.
In October last year Saddam Hussein started to impede their work
even more seriously than before. Months of negotiation followed.
Finally, faced with the threat of force, Saddam Hussein averted
military action by entering into a binding memorandum of understanding
with Kofi Annan, the U.N. secretary-general. But despite that, he
continued to obstruct. In August he suspended cooperation with the
U.N. inspectors. On October the 30th he ended the cooperation
totally. He resisted all appeals to come back into compliance with
the agreements he made. Indeed, quite the contrary; he used the time
both for further prevarication and for the dispersal of his military
capability.
As you know, on November the 14th, I issued the authority to
strike against Iraq as part of a joint U.S.-U.K. operation. At the
last moment, aware that he was about to be attacked, Saddam offered
full, unconditional, unrestricted cooperation with UNSCOM. Again he
made that promise.
We called off that attack. We made that last extra effort to
avoid the use of force.
The inspectors again, as you know, went back to work. We said at
the time very clearly, very directly, that we would hold Saddam to his
word and that should he break that word once more, there would be no
warnings, no wranglings, no last-minute negotiations. So we made the
position crystal-clear to him and to the entirety of the world
community.
Richard Butler, the head of the U.N. Special Commission, promised
his report on Iraqi cooperation within a month. It came out last
night, on time, as scheduled.
It is damning. It is a catalogue of obstruction. It shows quite
clearly one more time, that Saddam has no intention whatever of
keeping to his word. He is a serial breaker of promises.
And the reason for that obstruction, for breaking his word, is
also now clear; it is his desire to develop these weapons of mass
destruction. He has not for one instant yielded up that malign
intent. The threat is now, and it is a threat to his neighbors, to
his people, and to the security of the world. If, therefore, he is
not stopped now, the consequences to our future peace are real and
fundamental. We cannot responsibly let that happen.
Let me remind you, since 1991, the inspectors destroyed or
rendered harmless 48 Scud missiles, 40,000 chemical munitions, 690
tons of chemical-weapons agents, 3,000 tons of precursor chemicals;
and the al-Hakam biological-weapons factory, destroyed in 1996.
However, over 30,000 chemical-weapons warheads and 4,000 tons of
precursor chemicals remain unaccounted for. The U.N. and the world
community have shown by the resolutions passed, calling for
unconditional cooperation with the weapons inspectors, that they know
fully the seriousness of the threat Saddam poses.
Following the Butler report, after more than a year of
obstruction and a catalogue of broken promises, which I have outlined
to you, we have no option but to act. Our objectives in this military
action are clear; to degrade his capability to build and use weapons
of mass destruction and to diminish the military threat he poses to
his neighbors.
The targets chosen, therefore, are targets connected with his military
capability, his weapons of mass destruction capacity, and his ability
to threaten his neighbors. We are taking every possible care to avoid
civilian casualties.
I cannot for obvious reasons go into operational details. But I
do want to say one further thing. Our quarrel is not with the Iraqi
people. It never has been. The whole world should know that we have
allowed Saddam to sell oil to buy as much food and medicine for the
Iraqi people as is necessary. It is a lie for him to say otherwise.
He could have fed and cared for his people, but he has chosen not to.
Our quarrel is with him alone and the evil regime which he represents.
There is no realistic alternative to military force. We are
taking this military action with real regret, but also with real
determination. We have exhausted all other avenues. We act because
we must.
Q Prime Minister, can you say how many personnel are
involved? (No response.)
END.
Copyright © 1998 by Federal News Service, Inc. No portion of this transcript may be copied, sold or retransmitted without the written authority of Federal News Service, Inc. Copyright is not claimed as to any part of the original work prepared by a United States government officer or employee as a part of that person's original duties. Transcripts of other events may be found at the Federal News Service Web site, located at www.fnsg.com.
Back to the top |