Mitt Romney is definitely not at home on the range.
Primaries in highly rural Alabama and Mississippi on Tuesday reinforced what a problem Romney has with rural conservatives, who tend to be more conservative than their urban and suburban counterparts.
Here’s all you need to know:
Notice how Romney’s Alabama support is clustered almost exclusively around the three big cities on the map?
It’s something we’ve seen over and over again.
Even in defeat, Mitt Romney is nothing if not consistent. In nearly every state where he has campaigned, exit polls show Romney performing basically the same in every major demographic group, give or take a few points.
And despite the results Tuesday night, it’s almost definitely good enough for him to win the GOP nomination.
That’s because, while those demographics have been too tough for him to overcome in Southern primaries and Midwestern caucus states, those states are basically done voting.
The road forward goes through much less conservative voters.
Approximately eight in 10 voters in today’s Alabama and Mississippi presidential primaries identify themselves as evangelical Christians, according to preliminary exit polls, the highest percentage of evangelicals in any early voting state to date.
In Mississippi, 83 percent of the electorate describes themselves as evangelicals while in Alabama that number is 79 percent. These numbers are from early exit polling and could, of course, shift somewhat.
Need to know where to look to figure out who’s having a good night in the Alabama and Mississippi presidential primaries? We’ve got you covered.
We asked a handful of political operatives in both states to give us the one (or two) counties that will tell us something significant about how former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich are faring tonight.
With Alabama and Mississippi set to take center stage in the Republican presidential race today, we asked our Twitter posse — we roll deep! — to tell us the handful of political tweeters in each state we had to follow.
The most-recommended nominees are below. You can also follow the whole list with a single click. Who did we miss? Add your nominees in the comments section below.
Here’s a simple fact that has been lost amid Mitt Romney’s newfound love of grits, Newt Gingrich’s desire for gun racks on Chevy Volts and Rick Santorum’s insistence that the South is a home game for him: None of the top three Republican presidential contenders are “of” the South in any meaningful way.
Voters are voting in Alabama and Mississippi (and Hawaii and American Samoa)!
That means it’s time for a Fix prediction contest where you, gentle reader, make the call on how the candidates will finish. If you win, the greatest prize known to man (or woman) — an official Fix t-shirt — is yours.
Here’s what you need to do: In the comments section below, predict the order of finish — with percentages! — for the top three candidates in Mississippi and Alabama. As a tiebreaker, give us your total turnout number for Alabama.
Polls close in both states at 8 p.m. eastern time so any predictions made after that time won’t count. And, to be eligible to win, you must make your prediction in the comments section.
For all of its unpredictability, there have been few actual surprises since voters began casting ballots in the 2012 Republican presidential race.
Mitt Romney won New Hampshire. Newt Gingrich won South Carolina. Romney won Florida. Even Rick Santorum’s (eventual) victory in Iowa wasn’t entirely surprising since polling suggested he was surging and social conservative candidates have a history of strong performances in the Hawkeye State. Santorum almost won in Michigan and Ohio, both of which would have been real surprises, but he didn’t.
Is 2012 another anti-incumbent year?
We should get a good indication Tuesday, when a couple more House incumbents face primaries funded by the Campaign for Primary Accountability, the group that helped unseat Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-Ohio) in last week’s primary.
Here are five House incumbents facing some real primaries tomorrow. All are favorites, but as was the case in Ohio, anything can happen.
The South doesn’t like Mitt Romney very much.
The South is Mitt Romney’s best friend right now.
Those two statements, while seemingly at odds with each other, might both be true in the coming weeks.
While Romney has shown a complete inability to win Southern states (a quirky race in Virginia aside), a succession of Southern states holding contests in the weeks ahead could actually play right into his hands by elevating Newt Gingrich back to the level of serious contender.
And if that happens, Rick Santorum’s path to victory gets much tougher.
There is a tendency among the political press corps — and the political world more generally — to search for the common string that ties together a national election.
At times — the elections of 2006, 2008 and 2010 come to mind — this is not only easy but right. Each of those elections were decided by a set of national issues that drove voters to choose Democrats overwhelmingly in 2006 and 2008 and Republicans equally overwhelmingly in 2010.
A constitutional amendment that would have defined a fertilized egg as a person failed on the ballot in Mississippi on Tuesday, dealing the so-called “personhood” movement another blow.
Mississippi would have become the first state to define a fertilized egg as a person, a measure which was aimed at outlawing abortion in the state but, opponents contended, would have led to all kinds of unintended consequences.
The GOP presidential race thus far has been about the economy, the economy and the economy, with occasional diversions on issues like health care, illegal immigration and now sexual harassment allegations (see today’s surprise Herman Cain presser).
And despite the GOP’s best efforts to keep the debate focused on the economy — and President Obama’s failings therein — it may be headed for the biggest diversion yet.
Voters in Mississippi will head to the polls Tuesday to vote on a “personhood” amendment that would designate a fertilized egg as a person – a move that would likely have the effect of outlawing abortion and, if you believe opponents, all kinds of other unintended consequences, such as criminalizing abortion and possibly restricting birth control and in-vitro fertilization. It could even criminalize a pregnant cancer patient’s chemotherapy, if you believe opponents.