Democracy Dies in Darkness


The Army kicked out dozens of immigrant recruits. Now it’s allowing them back amid a legal battle.

August 21, 2018 at 3:02 PM

A Pakistani recruit recently discharged from the U.S. Army. (Mike Knaak/Associated Press)

The Army on Mon­day re­instat­ed doz­ens of im­mi­grant re­serv­ists who sought cit­i­zen­ship through mil­i­tar­y en­list­ment, re­vers­ing a decision that has affected more than a hun­dred foreign-born recruits amid a law­suit con­tend­ing some dis­miss­als were un­fair and giv­en without cause.

The decision puts the recruits back on a path of ex­pe­dit­ed cit­i­zen­ship the mil­i­tar­y has prom­ised in ex­change for cru­cial lan­guage and med­i­cal skills. Until re­cent­ly, these soldiers could be­come American cit­i­zens with­in months of en­ter­ing train­ing, sig­nif­i­cant­ly fast­er than the nat­u­ral­i­za­tion proc­ess out­side the mil­i­tar­y.

The Army’s re­ver­sal is the lat­est con­ces­sion in a bar­rage of court fil­ings that claim the re­cent dis­charge of im­mi­grant recruits vio­lat­ed Army pol­icy and po­ten­tial­ly vio­lat­ed due proc­ess guar­an­teed in the Constitution. Critics of the Penta­gon’s han­dling of the pro­gram say it points to se­ri­ous prob­lems with how the mil­i­tar­y vets its for­eign recruits.

Army of­fi­cials said in a Mon­day court fil­ing that six re­serv­ists in­volved in a law­suit had their dis­charg­es re­voked, along with 32 reservists whose dismissals were halt­ed. A total of 149 cases are be­ing reviewed, the Army said.

More than 10,000 im­mi­grants have en­tered the mil­i­tar­y since 2009 through the pro­gram, which sought to en­list im­mi­grants with skills the Penta­gon has said are es­pe­cial­ly vi­tal to mil­i­tar­y mis­sions.

An Associated Press re­port from July said the Army had be­gun dis­charg­ing doz­ens of im­mi­grant recruits, prompt­ing ques­tions over its decisions and proc­ess.

That led to a July 20 memo ordering a halt to discharges of im­mi­grants who en­listed in the Mil­i­tar­y Ac­ces­sions Vi­tal to the National In­ter­est (MAVNI) program, to e­val­u­ate its ad­min­is­tra­tive proc­ess for sep­a­ra­tion. Days before the memo, the Army reversed the discharge of Lucas Calixto, a Bra­zil­ian re­serv­ist who first brought suit against the Army. His at­tor­neys de­clined to com­ment.

The re­in­state­ment of doz­ens of recruits and the broad­er look at 149 total cases is an out­crop­ping of that re­view, Penta­gon spokeswoman Air Force Maj. Carla Glea­son told The Washington Post on Tues­day.

Security con­cerns have driv­en the im­ple­men­ta­tion of com­pli­cat­ed and thorough vet­ting, Glea­son said, which scru­ti­niz­es im­mi­grants far more than U.S.-born troops. She has pre­vi­ous­ly said 20 MAVNI recruits have been in­ves­ti­gat­ed for na­tion­al se­curi­ty risks since 2013 but has not said if any of those probes led to charges or ar­rests.

Related: How the Pentagon ending its deal with immigrant recruits could hurt the military

The new screen­ing proc­ess im­ple­ment­ed in September 2016, along with broad se­curi­ty con­cerns, led the Penta­gon to shut­ter the pro­gram in De­cem­ber.

But the Army and the Penta­gon want the proc­ess to be above board and fair for recruits still in the pipe­line, Glea­son said. Recruits signed en­list­ment con­tracts. Be­cause of that, she not­ed, the mil­i­tar­y “wants to treat you with dig­ni­ty and re­spect.”

Court fil­ings and at­tor­neys for im­mi­grant recruits paint a dif­fer­ent pic­ture of how the mil­i­tar­y has han­dled the proc­ess.

Mar­ga­ret Stock, who helped im­ple­ment MAVNI when she was an Army of­fi­cer and is now an im­mi­gra­tion lawyer, said she has re­viewed or been told first hand a­bout 20 to 30 coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence re­view sum­maries ob­tained by recruits who filed Freedom of In­for­ma­tion Act re­quests.

She de­scribes re­views rid­dled with er­rors and leaps of log­ic.

A com­mon reason to weed out non-citizen recruits is the ex­ist­ence of for­eign rela­tives or send­ing mon­ey to rela­tives in oth­er count­ries — a fair­ly com­mon re­ali­ty for im­mi­grants.

“They set up a sys­tem de­signed to fail,” Stock told The Post.

One Chi­nese recruit and PhD can­di­date study­ing phys­ics was de­nied en­list­ment af­ter an Army coun­ter­in­tel­li­gence screen­er said he had trou­ble with so­cial inter­ac­tions and may have signs of “high func­tion­ing As­perg­er’s,” ac­cord­ing to a docu­ment re­viewed by The Post.

The recruit had no men­tal health di­ag­no­sis and hadn’t heard of the con­di­tion be­fore, Stock said. The screen­er wrote af­ter an inter­view that he had no med­i­cal ex­per­tise be­yond ob­serv­ing a fam­i­ly mem­ber with au­tism.

The recruit, who had en­listed in August 2016 and was told he failed the se­curi­ty re­view in June, had re­ceived no ex­pla­na­tion from his re­cruit­er and only ob­tained his screen­ing sum­ma­ry from a FOIA re­quest.

In a let­ter, his re­cruit­er said he was a­mong the most dis­ci­plined recruits under his su­per­vi­sion, Stock said.

Now his fu­ture as a cit­i­zen and sol­dier are in doubt. The Army did not immediately return comment about its screening policies.

Oth­er recruits have seen their lives upended by the Penta­gon’s han­dling of the MAVNI pro­gram.

More than 1,000 recruits had to wait so long for their checks to be fin­ished that they lost law­ful im­mi­gra­tion sta­tus, ex­pos­ing them to po­ten­tial de­por­ta­tion, the Penta­gon said in a memo ob­tained by The Post last sum­mer.

Some fled or sought a­sy­lum to avoid re­turn­ing to count­ries where they face per­se­cu­tion or that forbid for­eign mil­i­tar­y serv­ice, in­clud­ing one Iraqi-born recruit who fled to Canada out of fear that the Islamic State would as­sas­si­nate him if he were de­port­ed.

In oth­er in­stan­ces, some en­list­ment con­tracts were canceled nation­wide in an ap­par­ent and broad mis­under­stand­ing of rules that al­lowed recruits to wait an ad­di­tion­al year for the mil­i­tar­y to fin­ish the checks. Some Army re­cruit­ers re­instat­ed con­tracts for im­mi­grants short­ly af­ter re­ceiv­ing in­qui­ries from The Post in the fall.

Read more:

‘Fat Leon­ard’ scan­dal grows with indictment of three more retired Navy of­fi­cials

Penta­gon’s chief spokeswoman is un­der in­ves­ti­ga­tion for allegedly mis­treat­ing em­ploy­ees

Alex Horton is a general assignment reporter for The Washington Post. He previously covered the military and national security for Stars and Stripes, and served in Iraq as an Army infantryman.

Post Recommends

We're glad you're enjoying The Washington Post.

Get access to this story, and every story, on the web and in our apps with our Basic Digital subscription.

Welcome to The Washington Post

Thank you for subscribing