Dear Dr. Gridlock:

My biggest pet peeve is road signs and the highway departments responsible for them. Signs are too often missing or inadequate (how many years did it take for them to put up signs from Interstate 395 north to the southbound George Washington Parkway?), just plain wrong or impossible to read at night.

Errol Waits


You strike a chord with me. I've lobbied for years for a G.W. Parkway sign on I-395. You would think that would be a no-brainer, but the Virginia Department of Transportation said that there were too many letters in the George Washington Memorial Parkway name to fit on an overhead sign, and that a ground-mounted sign would add to sign clutter in that area. In recent months, VDOT somehow managed to put one up as part of a sign redesign of Pentagon area roadways.

VDOT could be a lot more helpful to motorists with efficient, consistent signs. For instance, overhead signs should be lit at night and should note cross streets, so that approaching motorists can get into the correct turn lane.

The existing little signs at the corners are often too small and too poorly lit to be seen at night. For instance, try going inbound on Route 29 (Lee Highway) to its intersection with Gallows Road in Merrifield. That is a major intersection, but there is no overhead sign, and it is hard to see the small Gallows Road sign at the corner at night.

Other states provide overhead signs that can be seen from a distance. Maryland does. VDOT says the overhead signs are too heavy to be mounted on the traffic light wires that span some intersections. But Maryland manages that quite nicely.

Anyone care at VDOT? I don't think so.

Beware Broken Meters

Dear Dr. Gridlock:

Challenging broken parking meters in Arlington is not a hassle at all [Dr. Gridlock, Oct. 9]. I've done it twice, and all I had to do was call the Arlington County telephone number listed on the parking meter to first report the malfunctioning meter and later check on the result of my report. In both cases, the tickets were voided.

In the first case, the meter was eating the quarters faster than normal; in the second case, the meter was not working and the dome displayed a FAIL sign.

Antonio Russo


I'm glad your situations worked out. But I don't advise parking at broken meters. You can become hostage to a bureaucracy. That can be a problem, especially in the District, which issues some 2 million parking tickets a year.

I get e-mails from despairing souls who parked at broken meters in the District, got ticketed, reported the broken meters promptly, took time off to appeal the tickets and still had the fines upheld, and in some cases doubled for failure to pay on time.

Beware the broken meter.

Explain Yourself

Dear Dr. Gridlock:

I was reading in your column [Dr. Gridlock, Oct. 6] the litany of pet peeves that people had about driving. It occurred to me that maybe you should put a call out for responses from people who actually do the things that peeve other people, like running red lights/stop signs, sitting a car length behind the stop lights, weaving in and out of traffic, not using turn signals, turning right or left from the center lane, etc. Ask them to let us all know why they do those things.

I doubt you'll get many responses, unless it's drivers who have guilty consciences and did it once but never again.

But I really am curious to understand why people behave like that.

Virginia Johnson


I would like to hear from them, too, but I don't run anonymous letters. Getting someone to admit to rude or lawbreaking driving -- and why they do it -- could be problematic. Anyone out there want to comment?

Matter of Depth Perception

Dear Dr. Gridlock:

A letter in a recent column [Dr. Gridlock, Oct. 6] questioned why people would pull front first into parking spaces instead of backing into them.

Here is the reason: Not all of us were blessed with perfect eyesight. For those with no depth perception, backing into a narrow space would be dangerous.

The owners of the cars on either side of us should be grateful we don't try. Backing out into the wide traveling lane is much easier for us, even if we do have to watch for traffic.

And while we're on the subject, here's a request for people who like to back into spaces: Please don't do it when there are people behind you. It takes longer to back into a space than to pull into one, and it holds up traffic.

Especially don't do it if you have reason to believe the people behind you are in a hurry to get where they are going. For example, in the Kennedy Center parking garage before a performance, or at a stadium before a game.

Donna Kepler


When you have a choice of where to park, I recommend doing so a little farther away where you might be able to find empty back-to-back spaces. Pull through to the second space, and you'll wind up parked front pointing out, as if you had backed into the space.

Blocking the Box

Dear Dr. Gridlock:

Concerning Robert Van Epps's pet peeve about drivers who do not move into the intersection to make a turn when the light turns green [Dr. Gridlock, Oct. 6]:

As the father of a sheriff's deputy and a volunteer firefighter, I can tell you that one of their pet peeves is people who move into the box, or the center of the intersection, when a light turns green, but a turn is not possible because of oncoming traffic.

I have been taught to stay out of the box until it is clear for me to complete my turn.

Thomas H. Brown


It is proper and accepted practice around here that the lead vehicle waiting to make a left turn can creep into the intersection and wait for a gap in oncoming traffic, even if the turn has to be made at the end of the green light cycle (on amber or red).

However, a second motorist should not creep into the intersection until after the first one has made the turn and the light is still green. Vehicles bunching up in the intersection can lead to the blocking that you describe, Mr. Brown.

D.C. Traffic Enforcement

Dear Dr. Gridlock:

Having read recently about the ineffectiveness of the District's red light cameras, I am wondering how long it will take the city to realize that it is speeding that is the problem.

It seems that the police have completely given up on controlling speed in this city. Traveling 20 mph or more over speed limits in the city appears to be common practice and is the real danger on our streets.

Is policing speeders just an impossible task?

Bill London


Apparently it is an impossible task, considering the extent of the city's traffic enforcement. Do you know how many officers the Metropolitan Police Department assigns to traffic patrol in the downtown commercial center? Zero. They could be methodically enforcing traffic laws, such as speeding and intersection blocking, but they are not.

The Department of Public Works handles the parking control aides who write most of the parking tickets but do not issue tickets for moving violations. The two dozen traffic control aides who are posted at downtown intersections also work for the Department of Public Works and also do not write tickets for moving violations.

District police do have a dozen or so fixed speed cameras and mobile cameras in cruisers to cite violators. Those cameras record license plate numbers, and police issue citations by mail. And, the city has about 50 cameras at various intersections to catch red light runners.

Is that effort enough? If you drive in the city, you know the answer.

Transportation researcher Diane Mattingly contributed to this column.

Dr. Gridlock appears Thursdays in the Extra and Sundays in the Metro section. You can write to Dr. Gridlock at 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071. He prefers to receive e-mail, at, or faxes, at 703-352-3908. Include your full name, town, county and day and evening telephone numbers.