American hospital leaders opened their battle against President Presient Cater's health cost control bill yesterday by saying it would entagle hospitals in new federal regulations and force them to ration the saving of lives.
Two top administration officials -- chief presidential economic adviser Charles L. Schultze and Health, Education and Welfare Secretary Joesph A. Califno -- called the charges untrue and deceptive.
And Sen. Edward M Kennedy (D-Mass.), in a fiery summary of the dayhs hearing before his Senate health subcommittee, accused the hospital spokesmen of "gross distortion" of a measure that would only curb needless and often harmful surgery, Xrays, medications and hospitalizations.
In a new development on this subcommittee he heads so forcefully, Kennedy found himself faced with an equally forceful opponent, Pennsylvania Republican Richard M Schweiker. Schweiker this year replaced New York's Jocob Javits -- a Republican but a co-sponsor oif the hospital cost bill -- as the subcommittee's ranking Republican.
The bill would fight hosptal inflation and inflation in general by limiting the future spending of any hospital that fails to meet the Administration's "voluntary" goal of a 9.7 percent increase in 1979.
In a hearing dramatically staged in the steeply pictched medical auditorium of the new Childrenhs Hospital Center next door.
"There are two more shopping carts outside with District of Columbia regulations and other federal regulations affecting hospitals" Schweiker said. "How much will the new bill add to this pile?"
Califano waved a slim strip of green paper with a single phrase printed on it "This is the only added piece of information needed from hospitals if mandatory cost controls go into effect," he said. "It calls for one line -- the hospital's non-supervisory wage rate -- to be filled in. We have all the other information we need."
Califano said mandatory controls -- if needed -- would take only 100 new people in HEW and cost only $10 million a year toi administer, "a real bargain when you consider" that the bill would save the federal government $21.8 billion and the American people $53.4 billion in all between 1980 and 1984.
Schweiker, dissecting the bill piece by peice, said it would give the HEW secretary 17 new pieces of authority, including the power to exempt individual hospitals from control. There is no way one person could exercise such large -- and questionable -- power without huge paperwork, Schweiker argued.
Then Michael Bromberg, executive director of the Federation of American Hospitals, said, "You'll need a dozen shopping carts just to handle the hospitals' requesrs for exemptions."
"If Congress passes this bill," added Bromberg, it will "scare" hospitals into adding new price increases before they are limited, spoil their present, truly voluntary effort to control costs -- the president's "sole success story" against inflation -- and replace cooperation with an "adversary relationship" featuring endless court battles.
Bromberg and Alex McMahon, president of the giant American Hospital Association -- the AHA represents virtually all hospitals; the FAH investor-owned bill is unneeded in view of recentl hospital success in curbing spending.
Partly as a result of the hospitlas' effort -- but in good part as a result of tough mandatory controls in nine states -- american hospitals increased their total spending by just 12.8 percent last year, compared with a 15.6 percent 1977 increase.
It is highly unfair, said McMahon and Brombert, to control just one sector of the nation's widely overheated economy.
Not true, Schultze replied. "Clearly," he said, controlling hispital costs is a key in controlling inflation, since it is outracing most other causes. Hs also said the Carter proposal could save the country's employers enough in health insurance premiums and Medicare payroll taxes to cut prices by $5 billion a year.
"Surely," he siad, "that is nothing to be sneezed at," as well as a rare case where so much can be saved in one federal swoop.
Further, Schultze argued, controls are especially needed in health care because it is not a free market, but one where consumers make few choices and lay out little cash. And the choices are made by doctors who don't pay the bills, either, he added.
Schweiker and the hospital officials hammered at another point. The Carter bill would allow hospitals a one-percent-a-year increase for population growth.
Every year, said McMahon, hospitals are caring for more people and for older caring for more people and for older people who need more services. These elements, plus new, improved services have been growing by 7 percent a year, Schweiker said. "So how can you say you will not ration health care if you allow onlu 1.8 percent? How can you say you won't cut somebody out of the system?"
"You're saying we can't add coronary care units and intensive care units," said Bromberg. "The American people don't know this They think we're just talking about raising our prices."
"The bill will cause a deterioration of care," McMahon claimed.
No, "we're just talking about belttightening" and abandoning the false idea that "more is necessarily better," said Kennedy, in a debate that will continue as other congressional committees wrestle with this legislation.