The Washington Post

Snowquester: Snow is hard

Classic forecast: 2 to 18 inches Classic forecast: 2 to 18 inches

Just looked outside. End. Of. The. World. Snow is actually STICKING to the grass, surely a harbinger of unfathomable torments to come. I think I have no choice but to go back to bed. See you Thursday!

I’m all in favor of a snow day, of an unscheduled down day, and in fact we probably ought to have more voluntary grid outages, or just Turn Off Your Devices day, so that we can spend more time doing what we were put here on Earth to do. I forgot what that was, exactly, but I know it wasn’t “texting” or “blogging” or “tweeting.” Was it farming? It’s been so long since I learned this stuff, the basics of human existence. But surely we all miss the days when we rose before dawn to hack at the earth with a blunt tool, hoping to get the seeds in before the maelstrom or the coming of the locusts. The problem with life today is we lack the fiber and fortitude that we used to have when we spent a lot of time on Locust Watch.

Anyhow, looking outside, it crosses my mind that we ought to do a story about how it’s really hard to predict snowfall amounts. That’ll probably get assigned any minute now. Until then, here’s the one I wrote yesterday:

By J.A.

Snow is hard. This is a fact of meteorological life.

A forecaster trying to predict snowfall has to track many variables: the amount of precipitation, the intensity of precipitation, the air temperature, the surface temperature, the atmospheric structure, the timing of everything, the migration of the rain/snow line, and so on.

Any mistake is exaggerated by the very nature of snow, the way an inch of rain gets multiplied into 10 inches of white stuff (or six heavy inches, or 15 or 20 or even 30 powdery inches, depending on the snow’s wetness – another variable!).Snow exposes failure. If the weatherperson botches a rainfall prediction, no one notices, because it’s hard for an ordinary person to judge rainfall totals, and the storm sewers gobble up the excess. But someone can detect a bad snow forecast — too much snow, or too little — just by looking out the window.

“With winter storms, the devil’s always in the details,” said Christopher Vaccaro, spokesman for the National Weather Service.

So it was that in Washington on Tuesday the weather remained stubbornly uncertain. A big storm — Snowquester! — was erupting from all the computer models and was just hours from slamming into Washington, yet the weather in the real world remained strikingly pleasant for much of the day, with nothing even slightly ominous on the horizon. Snowstorm coming? Really? With thundersnow???

The experts said yes, but they hedged their language and dribbled caveats across the forecast. This was a slippery situation, typical for Washington in March. Particularly in the eastern parts of the region, it remained unclear who, exactly, would get hit with how much snow, and if the event would be mostly solid or mostly liquid, and whether, when it was all over, we would say it was an epic snowstorm or complain that it was just a soggy mess.

“You have to get not only the temperature right, but the temperature structure in the atmosphere – how the temperature varies with height,” says Cliff Mass, a professor of atmospheric sciences at the University of Washington. For example, he said, if there’s a very shallow warm area at the surface — where humans walk around and wonder how it could possibly snow, much less snow enough to shut down the government and parole the schoolkids — the flakes, formed higher in the atmosphere, can still make it to the ground, because they need about 1,000 feet of warm air to melt.

The snowfall prediction maps for this storm, as of Tuesday afternoon, showed dramatic differences in accumulations across relatively short distances. The Capital Weather Gang’s forecast showed roughly one to four inches on the Eastern Shore, three to eight inches (a rather large margin of error) for the capital proper, six to 12 (!) inches in the western and northern suburbs and up to 15 inches along the Blue Ridge Mountains.

But confidence, like snowfall predictions, was also stratified by geography. Out toward the mountains, the forecast Tuesday morning showed a big snowstorm as a certainty. Confidence in a big snow event shifted eastward, and the National Weather Service on Tuesday afternoon extended a winter storm warning (meaning five inches of snow or more, no doubt) to the closer suburbs and the District.

Click here to read Take 2 of the story.

Joel Achenbach writes on science and politics for the Post's national desk and on the "Achenblog."



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
In defense of dads
Scenes from Brazil's Carajás Railway
Play Videos
For good coffee, sniff, slurp and spit
How to keep your child safe in the water
How your online data can get hijacked
Play Videos
How to avoid harmful chemicals in school supplies
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
How much can one woman eat?
Play Videos
What you need to know about Legionnaires' disease
How to get organized for back to school
Pandas, from birth to milk to mom
Next Story
Joel Achenbach · March 4, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.