The Washington Post

Paywall time

There’s a lot to say about paywalls and business models and the future of journalism and the deep questions of whether information really wants to be free or, as I’ve often claimed, stolen, and I can feel the powerful urge to go into a tirade about the decline of old-school journalistic values and Western Civilization in general, but you already know what I think about this. Also, I’m having computer problems. Gremlins.

A small  observation: Many of the people who commented on our story about the Post adopting a paywall seem to view the paper as primarily a producer of opinion journalism. Maybe that’s not the intent of these commenters. But there’s so much focus in Webworld on the opinionators, with a lot of umbrage taken that we publish certain people who produce opinions that certain other people disagree with (please, no one diagram that sentence!).  But the opinions operation is a small part of the newsroom. I wish more people would talk about all the other things we do here. Consider our photography. One of the rewards of working here is that I get to collaborate with brilliant photographers, videographers, graphics artists, etc., who are at the very top of their game, and who make me better as a reporter. True, you can find plenty of photographs on the web, and everyone’s a photographer these days. But trust me: The pros are better. They’re a lot better. They see things the rest of us don’t see. They understand light and shadow and texture and framing. And they’re great reporters, too; they know where the story is.  It’s a great honor to work with the best in the business.

Look at today’s front page: A story from Baghdad; a story from Argentina; a new national poll produced by the Post and ABC News. A tragic local story about the shooting of a teenager. This is journalism that costs a lot to produce; we can’t do it without revenue. The market will determine what our work is worth, and we certainly need to try very hard to produce stories and photos etc. that people will want to pay for. But giving it away for free makes no sense and I’m not sure it ever made sense. Yes, you can find lots of free content on the web — and you generally get what you pay for.

Joel Achenbach writes on science and politics for the Post's national desk and on the "Achenblog."



Success! Check your inbox for details. You might also like:

Please enter a valid email address

See all newsletters

Show Comments

Sign up for email updates from the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

You have signed up for the "Confronting the Caliphate" series.

Thank you for signing up
You'll receive e-mail when new stories are published in this series.
Most Read



Success! Check your inbox for details.

See all newsletters

Your Three. Videos curated for you.
Play Videos
Be a man and cry
Deaf banjo player teaches thousands
Sleep advice you won't find in baby books
Play Videos
Drawing as an act of defiance
A flood of refugees from Syria but only a trickle to America
Chicago's tacos, four ways
Play Videos
What you need to know about filming the police
What you need to know about trans fats
Syrian refugee: 'I’m committed to the power of music'
Play Videos
Riding the X2 with D.C.'s most famous rapper
Full disclosure: 3 bedrooms, 2 baths, 1 ghoul
Europe's migrant crisis, explained
Next Story
Joel Achenbach · March 14, 2013

To keep reading, please enter your email address.

You’ll also receive from The Washington Post:
  • A free 6-week digital subscription
  • Our daily newsletter in your inbox

Please enter a valid email address

I have read and agree to the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Please indicate agreement.

Thank you.

Check your inbox. We’ve sent an email explaining how to set up an account and activate your free digital subscription.